Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.1-1)
Hi Ben, Ben Hutchings wrote: I wonder which kernel is targeted for Wheezy. According to http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/stable-status-01-2012.html neither 3.1 nor 3.2 will be longterm supported kernels while 3.0 will get longterm support by upstream. IIRC there was once at least the question if 3.0 should be used for Wheezy. But I guess that's no more a question as 3.0 is no more in unstable nor testing. (Sorry if that question had been answered before, but recently that question came up on IRC when someone posted the above mentioned link.) These should answer your questions: http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2011/12/msg6.html Ah, that's the mail I had in mind -- although with wrong version numbers. http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2012/01/msg00254.html And that's the mail I missed. Thanks for the pointers! Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert a...@debian.org, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `-| 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120116094126.gs2...@sym.noone.org
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.1-1)
Hi Ben, Ben Hutchings wrote: I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.1-1 to unstable early this week. This is the latest upstream version (3.2) together with the first upstream stable update. I wonder which kernel is targeted for Wheezy. According to http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/stable-status-01-2012.html neither 3.1 nor 3.2 will be longterm supported kernels while 3.0 will get longterm support by upstream. IIRC there was once at least the question if 3.0 should be used for Wheezy. But I guess that's no more a question as 3.0 is no more in unstable nor testing. (Sorry if that question had been answered before, but recently that question came up on IRC when someone posted the above mentioned link.) Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert a...@debian.org, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `-| 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120116005527.go2...@sym.noone.org
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.1-1)
On 16/01/12 01:55, Axel Beckert wrote: Hi Ben, Ben Hutchings wrote: I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.1-1 to unstable early this week. This is the latest upstream version (3.2) together with the first upstream stable update. I wonder which kernel is targeted for Wheezy. According to http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/stable-status-01-2012.html neither 3.1 nor 3.2 will be longterm supported kernels while 3.0 will get longterm support by upstream. IIRC there was once at least the question if 3.0 should be used for Wheezy. But I guess that's no more a question as 3.0 is no more in unstable nor testing. (Sorry if that question had been answered before, but recently that question came up on IRC when someone posted the above mentioned link.) Regards, Axel 3.2 would be maintained (at least) by Ubuntu up to 2017 since they will be using it for their 12.04 LTS release There is a thread for the discussion about the Wheezy kernel here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2012/01/msg00254.html Regards! -- ~~~ Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez http://neutrino.es Igalia - Free Software Engineeringhttp://www.igalia.com ~~~ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.1-1)
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 01:55 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: Hi Ben, Ben Hutchings wrote: I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.1-1 to unstable early this week. This is the latest upstream version (3.2) together with the first upstream stable update. I wonder which kernel is targeted for Wheezy. According to http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/stable-status-01-2012.html neither 3.1 nor 3.2 will be longterm supported kernels while 3.0 will get longterm support by upstream. IIRC there was once at least the question if 3.0 should be used for Wheezy. But I guess that's no more a question as 3.0 is no more in unstable nor testing. (Sorry if that question had been answered before, but recently that question came up on IRC when someone posted the above mentioned link.) These should answer your questions: http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2011/12/msg6.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2012/01/msg00254.html Ben. -- Ben Hutchings When in doubt, use brute force. - Ken Thompson signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
