Re: linux migration to testing

2022-08-18 Thread Paul Gevers

Hi Ben,

On 18-08-2022 23:09, Ben Hutchings wrote:

For your info, s390x still fails:
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/s390x/l/linux/24628411/log.gz


Also for ppc64el.


I noticed right after sending.


These two are fixed by:
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/commit/8d439f0beb3f97ff0e11dae3d70da33597642f9f


Thanks a lot for the quick fix.

Paul


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: linux migration to testing

2022-08-18 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 22:15 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> 
> On 01-08-2022 23:09, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2022-08-01 at 22:53 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > On 01-08-2022 22:46, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > Could you please allow this version to enter testing despite the test
> > > > failures?
> > > 
> > > If you promise to fix it in the next upload.
> > 
> > Yes, the fix is already in the git repo.
> 
> For your info, s390x still fails:
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/s390x/l/linux/24628411/log.gz

Also for ppc64el.  These two are fixed by:
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/commit/8d439f0beb3f97ff0e11dae3d70da33597642f9f

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: linux migration to testing

2022-08-15 Thread Paul Gevers

Hi Ben,

On 01-08-2022 23:09, Ben Hutchings wrote:

On Mon, 2022-08-01 at 22:53 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:

On 01-08-2022 22:46, Ben Hutchings wrote:

Could you please allow this version to enter testing despite the test
failures?


If you promise to fix it in the next upload.


Yes, the fix is already in the git repo.


For your info, s390x still fails:
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/s390x/l/linux/24628411/log.gz

Paul


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: linux migration to testing

2022-08-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2022-08-01 at 22:53 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> 
> On 01-08-2022 22:46, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > linux 5.18.14-1 is currently blocked from migration due to a test
> > regression on some architectures.
> > 
> > This is actually not a regression: there's a new test case, and it was
> > defined wrongly for architectures other than amd64 and arm64.  That
> > should be fixed with the next upload, but I'd rather not go through
> > another build/sign/build/wait cycle.
> > 
> > Could you please allow this version to enter testing despite the test
> > failures?
> 
> If you promise to fix it in the next upload.

Yes, the fix is already in the git repo.

> hint added.

Thanks,

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Larkinson's Law: All laws are basically false.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: linux migration to testing

2022-08-01 Thread Paul Gevers

Hi Ben,

On 01-08-2022 22:46, Ben Hutchings wrote:

linux 5.18.14-1 is currently blocked from migration due to a test
regression on some architectures.

This is actually not a regression: there's a new test case, and it was
defined wrongly for architectures other than amd64 and arm64.  That
should be fixed with the next upload, but I'd rather not go through
another build/sign/build/wait cycle.

Could you please allow this version to enter testing despite the test
failures?


If you promise to fix it in the next upload.

hint added.

Paul


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature