Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-02-11 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi all I can now announce an half official statement from Kir (who is the project manager of openvz) that they are now dedicated to make a openvz. This is what he states: - Hi Ola, guys, Thanks for the info. We have discussed this at length and the resolution is we are all for it.

Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-25 Thread Michael Tokarev
Marco d'Itri wrote: On Jan 24, maximilian attems m...@stro.at wrote: [] On the negative side it doesn't have yet checkpointing support and not all net/ has netns support yet. It's not just that, AFAIK there is no match for many of the user_beancounters features (especially the accounting

Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-25 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:26:42AM +, Marco d'Itri wrote: Actually I meant vzctl exec so this is not even close: I need to change the context of a running process. Hu? vzctl exec does a fork and an exec. Please enlighten me where the support you want is actually implemented. Bastian --

Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-25 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010, Suno Ano wrote: Bastian Please describe the _kernel_ improvements over the normal Bastian images. Most of it is already enabled in the default images Bastian and does not warrant for an extra image. As you can see from http://sunoano.pastebin.com/m4b5380dc , line 29,

Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-25 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 06:19:02PM +0100, Suno Ano wrote: As you can see from http://sunoano.pastebin.com/m4b5380dc , line 29, Cgroup memory controller is not. This setting is mandatory if you want to control the available memory per containers and the like. It is not mandantory for the

Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-25 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jan 25, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:26:42AM +, Marco d'Itri wrote: Actually I meant vzctl exec so this is not even close: I need to change the context of a running process. Hu? vzctl exec does a fork and an exec. Please enlighten me where the

lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-24 Thread maximilian attems
hello, the plan as decided in Portland was to go forward with openvz if upstream provides us with a patch in time. as currently this looks quite bad (latest available patch is for 2.6.27, there is no sign of a patch for 2.6.32, nor any schedule like it happened to be for Lenny). I thus propose

Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-24 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jan 24, maximilian attems m...@stro.at wrote: the plan as decided in Portland was to go forward with openvz if upstream provides us with a patch in time. as currently this looks quite bad (latest available patch is for 2.6.27, there is no sign of a patch for 2.6.32, nor any schedule like

Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-24 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 01:37:26PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: I thus propose to enable an lxc (linux containers) [1] flavour: Please describe the _kernel_ improvements over the normal images. Most of it is already enabled in the default images and does not warrant for an extra image. *

Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-24 Thread Suno Ano
Bastian Please describe the _kernel_ improvements over the normal Bastian images. Most of it is already enabled in the default images Bastian and does not warrant for an extra image. As you can see from http://sunoano.pastebin.com/m4b5380dc , line 29, Cgroup memory controller is not. This

Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-24 Thread Marco d'Itri
In linux.debian.kernel Suno Ano suno@sunoano.org wrote: - most folks run Linux-VServer, OpenVZ, LXC etc. on boxes they own plus they control themselves so that is not really an issue I wonder how you came to this conclusion. - those environments in need for limits/beancounters (disk

Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-24 Thread Suno Ano
- Those environments in need for limits/beancounters (disk quota etc.) May probably have to wait another six months or so until it will be available in LXC. Till then it is quite possible to run on 2.6.26 with OpenVZ and then migrate things to LXC. Marco So it will not actually be

Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 15:17 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Jan 24, maximilian attems m...@stro.at wrote: the plan as decided in Portland was to go forward with openvz if upstream provides us with a patch in time. as currently this looks quite bad (latest available patch is for 2.6.27,

Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-24 Thread Marco d'Itri
In linux.debian.kernel Suno Ano suno@sunoano.org wrote: Marco So it will not actually be available in squeeze, and squeeze Marco cannot work with the lenny kernels unless they are rebuilt with Marco CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=n. You could as well have said proposed Marco to wait and use the

Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-24 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 03:17:14PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: lack of the equivalent of vzctl enter is a critical issue for my applications. looks feasable thanks to libvirt: virsh --connect lxc:/// console v1 http://libvirt.org/drvlxc.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-24 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 03:17:14PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Jan 24, maximilian attems m...@stro.at wrote: the plan as decided in Portland was to go forward with openvz if upstream provides us with a patch in time. as currently this looks quite bad (latest available patch is for

Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-24 Thread Marco d'Itri
In linux.debian.kernel maximilian attems m...@stro.at wrote: On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 03:17:14PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: lack of the equivalent of vzctl enter is a critical issue for my applications. looks feasable thanks to libvirt: virsh --connect lxc:/// console v1