Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> Since each translation needs several "accepts as is", I am not 100%
> sure if any of those passed the requirement. Could this be the problem?
> (That new translations were actually not produced yet?). Or is there a
> problem writing the files?
If I remember things rig
Arf, Arf, Arf, missing the timestamp 201803030245 directory, not updating i18n,
arf, arf, arf
___
Debian-l10n-devel mailing list
Debian-l10n-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-l10n-devel
Arf, Arf, Arf, missing the timestamp 201803030245 directory, not updating i18n,
arf, arf, arf
___
Debian-l10n-devel mailing list
Debian-l10n-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-l10n-devel
Arf, Arf, Arf, missing the timestamp 201803030245 directory, not updating i18n,
arf, arf, arf
___
Debian-l10n-devel mailing list
Debian-l10n-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-l10n-devel
Arf, Arf, Arf, missing the timestamp 201803030245 directory, not updating i18n,
arf, arf, arf
___
Debian-l10n-devel mailing list
Debian-l10n-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-l10n-devel