Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, You should configure your alsa with "alsaconf". If you can't see your sound card in the list, that means your debian don't have necessary alsa drivers. Then, you should install new version of alsa drivers. You can download driver source tarball from www.alsa-project.org. (I have downloaded and installed latest release candidate, and it worked.) After download; $ ./configure --with-cards=all --with-card-options=all - --with-kernel=/usr/src/kernel-headers-2.6.11-1-686-smp $ make # make install # alsaconf Kerem. DNK wrote: > i have the described sound device but no sound is coming out of ma > system now what can i do? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC9PN2Zltqs+RRVkQRAo7JAKCojxmdWVBwGSKkysBo8ukVs53OIACfQ6tz RYjYBBtGNpBZPzke8yZbYz0= =vC7b -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
i have the described sound device but no sound is coming out of ma system now what can i do?
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:09:02PM +, Nyk Tarr wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:47:03PM -0500, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > > casue I screwed upit is ACPI not APCI. > APIC is also something completely different... > You'd think they could have picked different letters. Both are Intel acronyms, aren't they? -- --- Paul "TBBle" Hampson, MCSE 5th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU The Boss, Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Of course Pacman didn't influence us as kids. If it did, we'd be running around in darkened rooms, popping pills and listening to repetitive music. This email is licensed to the recipient for non-commercial use, duplication and distribution. --- pgpgbFMlaPdVd.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:09:02PM +, Nyk Tarr wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:47:03PM -0500, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > > casue I screwed upit is ACPI not APCI. > APIC is also something completely different... > You'd think they could have picked different letters. Both are Intel acronyms, aren't they? -- --- Paul "TBBle" Hampson, MCSE 5th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU The Boss, Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Of course Pacman didn't influence us as kids. If it did, we'd be running around in darkened rooms, popping pills and listening to repetitive music. This email is licensed to the recipient for non-commercial use, duplication and distribution. --- msg09868/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:47:03PM -0500, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > casue I screwed upit is ACPI not APCI. > APIC is also something completely different... You'd think they could have picked different letters. -- /__ \_|\/ /\
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:47:03PM -0500, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > casue I screwed upit is ACPI not APCI. > APIC is also something completely different... You'd think they could have picked different letters. -- /__ \_|\/ /\ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 11:21:20AM +0200, Baruch Even wrote: > * Jeremy Petzold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021126 11:05]: > > get the vanilla kernel. get the ACPI patch, and from the top level kernel > > source directory, if the patch file is zipped do a: > > > > zcat | patch -p0 > For the record, if someone is interested in patching the Debian kernel > and not the vanilla kernel, I have seperated the ACPI patches done to > the Debian kernel so that it is possible to revert only them so that one > can apply the ACPI patches. I wouldn't mind a copy of that, actually. -- --- Paul "TBBle" Hampson, MCSE 5th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU The Boss, Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Of course Pacman didn't influence us as kids. If it did, we'd be running around in darkened rooms, popping pills and listening to repetitive music. This email is licensed to the recipient for non-commercial use, duplication and distribution. --- pgpe9yLQbyevb.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 11:21:20AM +0200, Baruch Even wrote: > * Jeremy Petzold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021126 11:05]: > > get the vanilla kernel. get the ACPI patch, and from the top level kernel > > source directory, if the patch file is zipped do a: > > > > zcat | patch -p0 > For the record, if someone is interested in patching the Debian kernel > and not the vanilla kernel, I have seperated the ACPI patches done to > the Debian kernel so that it is possible to revert only them so that one > can apply the ACPI patches. I wouldn't mind a copy of that, actually. -- --- Paul "TBBle" Hampson, MCSE 5th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU The Boss, Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Of course Pacman didn't influence us as kids. If it did, we'd be running around in darkened rooms, popping pills and listening to repetitive music. This email is licensed to the recipient for non-commercial use, duplication and distribution. --- msg09837/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
* Jeremy Petzold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021126 11:05]: > get the vanilla kernel. get the ACPI patch, and from the top level kernel > source directory, if the patch file is zipped do a: > > zcat | patch -p0 For the record, if someone is interested in patching the Debian kernel and not the vanilla kernel, I have seperated the ACPI patches done to the Debian kernel so that it is possible to revert only them so that one can apply the ACPI patches. Baruch -- Baruch Even http://baruch.ev-en.org/ http://www.nongnu.org/chktex/
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
* Oleg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-25 19:19] : > On Monday 25 November 2002 02:24 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > > you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the > > ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest) > > into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your > > sound module and sound support set as modules or compiled in. > > Since nothing else works, looks like I'm going to have to try this ACPI > patch, but I'm not quite sure about a couple of things. > > Debian Woody 2.4.18 already has some patches applied to it, and the ACPI web > site only offers patches for vanilla kernels [1] Should I stop using the > Debian kernel then? (there is the same dilemma with swsusp, if I decide to > use it in the future) Pre-compiled kernels ? Probably, but you should definitely investigate using kernel-package to make Debian kernel packages. Fred
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
* Jeremy Petzold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021126 11:05]: > get the vanilla kernel. get the ACPI patch, and from the top level kernel > source directory, if the patch file is zipped do a: > > zcat | patch -p0 For the record, if someone is interested in patching the Debian kernel and not the vanilla kernel, I have seperated the ACPI patches done to the Debian kernel so that it is possible to revert only them so that one can apply the ACPI patches. Baruch -- Baruch Even http://baruch.ev-en.org/ http://www.nongnu.org/chktex/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
* Oleg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-25 19:19] : > On Monday 25 November 2002 02:24 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > > you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the > > ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest) > > into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your > > sound module and sound support set as modules or compiled in. > > Since nothing else works, looks like I'm going to have to try this ACPI > patch, but I'm not quite sure about a couple of things. > > Debian Woody 2.4.18 already has some patches applied to it, and the ACPI web > site only offers patches for vanilla kernels [1] Should I stop using the > Debian kernel then? (there is the same dilemma with swsusp, if I decide to > use it in the future) Pre-compiled kernels ? Probably, but you should definitely investigate using kernel-package to make Debian kernel packages. Fred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
casue I screwed upit is ACPI not APCI. get the vanilla kernel. get the ACPI patch, and from the top level kernel source directory, if the patch file is zipped do a: zcat | patch -p0 if it is not zipped do a: cat |patch -p0 then compile the kernel with ACPI compiled in. - Original Message - From: "Oleg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Maximilian Pascher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 7:40 PM Subject: Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > On Monday 25 November 2002 03:20 pm, Maximilian Pascher wrote: > > You have to apply it in Your kernel source-tree. Get it from > > http://acpi.sourceforge.net > > and patch Your kernel... After that You will find an extra menu option for > > ACPI and Your powermanagement will work. > > If You don't know how to patch, just ask :-) > > > > Now with Jeremy Petzold saying he meant "APCI", this gets very confusing. To > add more to the confusion: I can't find any APCI kernel patches on google, > and there isn't a sourceforge project called apci either (so maybe Jeremy was > confused twice, which accidentally makes him correct the first time?) > > BTW, the URL you posted doesn't link to the ACPI files. > (http://sourceforge.net/projects/acpi does though) > > Oleg > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
casue I screwed upit is ACPI not APCI. get the vanilla kernel. get the ACPI patch, and from the top level kernel source directory, if the patch file is zipped do a: zcat | patch -p0 if it is not zipped do a: cat |patch -p0 then compile the kernel with ACPI compiled in. - Original Message - From: "Oleg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Maximilian Pascher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 7:40 PM Subject: Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > On Monday 25 November 2002 03:20 pm, Maximilian Pascher wrote: > > You have to apply it in Your kernel source-tree. Get it from > > http://acpi.sourceforge.net > > and patch Your kernel... After that You will find an extra menu option for > > ACPI and Your powermanagement will work. > > If You don't know how to patch, just ask :-) > > > > Now with Jeremy Petzold saying he meant "APCI", this gets very confusing. To > add more to the confusion: I can't find any APCI kernel patches on google, > and there isn't a sourceforge project called apci either (so maybe Jeremy was > confused twice, which accidentally makes him correct the first time?) > > BTW, the URL you posted doesn't link to the ACPI files. > (http://sourceforge.net/projects/acpi does though) > > Oleg > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 03:25:05PM -0800, Fedor Karpelevitch wrote: > I have 2.4.19 from debian (which does not have any pathces applied, I > believe) and it does have ACPI options (and I do not see any APCI) and it > also has some APIC options. Is that what you mean, or am I missing > something? Yeah, you want the ACPI patch. It will _upgrade_ the ACPI support in your kernel from the old and nasty one to one that will fix your problem. APIC is a processor controller of some kind, originally only in SMP machines and now appearing in uniprocessor machines. Totally unrelated. APCI is a typo, I think. Oh, and you _may_ find the ACPI patch doesn't apply cleanly to the Debian 2.4.19 source. I vaguely remember it clashing as there was a patch to the old ACPI to fix a problem with some hardware or other, which isn't in the stock 2.4.19 kernel. That might have been 2.4.18 though. I forget. :-) Oh, and the latest ACPI patch is again 2.4.20-rc1. :-) http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=36832&release_id=123045 -- --- Paul "TBBle" Hampson, MCSE 5th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU The Boss, Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Of course Pacman didn't influence us as kids. If it did, we'd be running around in darkened rooms, popping pills and listening to repetitive music. This email is licensed to the recipient for non-commercial use, duplication and distribution. --- pgpCTCs9HeOdU.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
On Monday 25 November 2002 03:20 pm, Maximilian Pascher wrote: > You have to apply it in Your kernel source-tree. Get it from > http://acpi.sourceforge.net > and patch Your kernel... After that You will find an extra menu option for > ACPI and Your powermanagement will work. > If You don't know how to patch, just ask :-) > Now with Jeremy Petzold saying he meant "APCI", this gets very confusing. To add more to the confusion: I can't find any APCI kernel patches on google, and there isn't a sourceforge project called apci either (so maybe Jeremy was confused twice, which accidentally makes him correct the first time?) BTW, the URL you posted doesn't link to the ACPI files. (http://sourceforge.net/projects/acpi does though) Oleg
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:24 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the > ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest) > into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your > sound module and sound support set as modules or compiled in. Since nothing else works, looks like I'm going to have to try this ACPI patch, but I'm not quite sure about a couple of things. Debian Woody 2.4.18 already has some patches applied to it, and the ACPI web site only offers patches for vanilla kernels [1] Should I stop using the Debian kernel then? (there is the same dilemma with swsusp, if I decide to use it in the future) Oleg [1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/acpi
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
dohok...I was the victom of my own warning :-p...get teh APCI patch. - Original Message - From: "Fedor Karpelevitch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Jeremy Petzold'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 6:25 PM Subject: RE: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec I have 2.4.19 from debian (which does not have any pathces applied, I believe) and it does have ACPI options (and I do not see any APCI) and it also has some APIC options. Is that what you mean, or am I missing something? -- fedor. "Ubi non accusator, ibi non judex." (Where there is no police, there is no speed limit.) -- Roman Law, trans. Petr Beckmann (1971) > -Original Message- > From: Jeremy Petzold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:40 PM > To: [email protected]; Ivar Alm > Subject: Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > > > no no...what you see in the kernel is APCI...it is diffrent than ACPI. > - Original Message - > From: "Ivar Alm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:05 PM > Subject: Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > > > At 20:24 2002-11-25, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > >you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then > compile all the > >ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks > out the rest) > >into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as > you have your > >sound module and sound support set as modules or compiled in. > > Just one short question... > I have read all over about the ACPI patch. Is that something > different from > the ACPI options in my kernel config? Can I compile a kernel for ACPI > directly, or do I have to apply a patch for it after > compilation/installation? > > //Ivar > - > ** > Ivar Alm ! Where does Microsoft want to drag you today? ! > Umeå, Sweden ! Do you really want to go there? ! > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.acc.umu.se/~octo > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
RE: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
I have 2.4.19 from debian (which does not have any pathces applied, I believe) and it does have ACPI options (and I do not see any APCI) and it also has some APIC options. Is that what you mean, or am I missing something? -- fedor. "Ubi non accusator, ibi non judex." (Where there is no police, there is no speed limit.) -- Roman Law, trans. Petr Beckmann (1971) > -Original Message- > From: Jeremy Petzold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:40 PM > To: [email protected]; Ivar Alm > Subject: Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > > > no no...what you see in the kernel is APCI...it is diffrent than ACPI. > - Original Message - > From: "Ivar Alm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:05 PM > Subject: Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > > > At 20:24 2002-11-25, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > >you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then > compile all the > >ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks > out the rest) > >into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as > you have your > >sound module and sound support set as modules or compiled in. > > Just one short question... > I have read all over about the ACPI patch. Is that something > different from > the ACPI options in my kernel config? Can I compile a kernel for ACPI > directly, or do I have to apply a patch for it after > compilation/installation? > > //Ivar > - > ** > Ivar Alm ! Where does Microsoft want to drag you today? ! > Umeå, Sweden ! Do you really want to go there? ! > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.acc.umu.se/~octo > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 03:25:05PM -0800, Fedor Karpelevitch wrote: > I have 2.4.19 from debian (which does not have any pathces applied, I > believe) and it does have ACPI options (and I do not see any APCI) and it > also has some APIC options. Is that what you mean, or am I missing > something? Yeah, you want the ACPI patch. It will _upgrade_ the ACPI support in your kernel from the old and nasty one to one that will fix your problem. APIC is a processor controller of some kind, originally only in SMP machines and now appearing in uniprocessor machines. Totally unrelated. APCI is a typo, I think. Oh, and you _may_ find the ACPI patch doesn't apply cleanly to the Debian 2.4.19 source. I vaguely remember it clashing as there was a patch to the old ACPI to fix a problem with some hardware or other, which isn't in the stock 2.4.19 kernel. That might have been 2.4.18 though. I forget. :-) Oh, and the latest ACPI patch is again 2.4.20-rc1. :-) http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=36832&release_id=123045 -- --- Paul "TBBle" Hampson, MCSE 5th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU The Boss, Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Of course Pacman didn't influence us as kids. If it did, we'd be running around in darkened rooms, popping pills and listening to repetitive music. This email is licensed to the recipient for non-commercial use, duplication and distribution. --- msg09816/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
On Monday 25 November 2002 03:20 pm, Maximilian Pascher wrote: > You have to apply it in Your kernel source-tree. Get it from > http://acpi.sourceforge.net > and patch Your kernel... After that You will find an extra menu option for > ACPI and Your powermanagement will work. > If You don't know how to patch, just ask :-) > Now with Jeremy Petzold saying he meant "APCI", this gets very confusing. To add more to the confusion: I can't find any APCI kernel patches on google, and there isn't a sourceforge project called apci either (so maybe Jeremy was confused twice, which accidentally makes him correct the first time?) BTW, the URL you posted doesn't link to the ACPI files. (http://sourceforge.net/projects/acpi does though) Oleg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:24 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the > ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest) > into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your > sound module and sound support set as modules or compiled in. Since nothing else works, looks like I'm going to have to try this ACPI patch, but I'm not quite sure about a couple of things. Debian Woody 2.4.18 already has some patches applied to it, and the ACPI web site only offers patches for vanilla kernels [1] Should I stop using the Debian kernel then? (there is the same dilemma with swsusp, if I decide to use it in the future) Oleg [1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/acpi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
dohok...I was the victom of my own warning :-p...get teh APCI patch. - Original Message - From: "Fedor Karpelevitch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Jeremy Petzold'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 6:25 PM Subject: RE: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec I have 2.4.19 from debian (which does not have any pathces applied, I believe) and it does have ACPI options (and I do not see any APCI) and it also has some APIC options. Is that what you mean, or am I missing something? -- fedor. "Ubi non accusator, ibi non judex." (Where there is no police, there is no speed limit.) -- Roman Law, trans. Petr Beckmann (1971) > -Original Message- > From: Jeremy Petzold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:40 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ivar Alm > Subject: Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > > > no no...what you see in the kernel is APCI...it is diffrent than ACPI. > - Original Message - > From: "Ivar Alm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:05 PM > Subject: Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > > > At 20:24 2002-11-25, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > >you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then > compile all the > >ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks > out the rest) > >into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as > you have your > >sound module and sound support set as modules or compiled in. > > Just one short question... > I have read all over about the ACPI patch. Is that something > different from > the ACPI options in my kernel config? Can I compile a kernel for ACPI > directly, or do I have to apply a patch for it after > compilation/installation? > > //Ivar > - > ** > Ivar Alm ! Where does Microsoft want to drag you today? ! > Umeå, Sweden ! Do you really want to go there? ! > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.acc.umu.se/~octo > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
Ouch... Better clean my glasses... Or rather get a pair? At 21:39 2002-11-25, Jeremy Petzold wrote: no no...what you see in the kernel is APCI...it is diffrent than ACPI. - Original Message - From: "Ivar Alm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:05 PM Subject: Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec At 20:24 2002-11-25, Jeremy Petzold wrote: >you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the >ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest) >into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your >sound module and sound support set as modules or compiled in. Just one short question... I have read all over about the ACPI patch. Is that something different from the ACPI options in my kernel config? Can I compile a kernel for ACPI directly, or do I have to apply a patch for it after compilation/installation? //Ivar - ** Ivar Alm ! Where does Microsoft want to drag you today? ! Umeå, Sweden ! Do you really want to go there? ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.acc.umu.se/~octo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ** Ivar Alm ! Where does Microsoft want to drag you today? ! Umeå, Sweden ! Do you really want to go there? ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.acc.umu.se/~octo
RE: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
I have 2.4.19 from debian (which does not have any pathces applied, I believe) and it does have ACPI options (and I do not see any APCI) and it also has some APIC options. Is that what you mean, or am I missing something? -- fedor. "Ubi non accusator, ibi non judex." (Where there is no police, there is no speed limit.) -- Roman Law, trans. Petr Beckmann (1971) > -Original Message- > From: Jeremy Petzold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:40 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ivar Alm > Subject: Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > > > no no...what you see in the kernel is APCI...it is diffrent than ACPI. > - Original Message - > From: "Ivar Alm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:05 PM > Subject: Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > > > At 20:24 2002-11-25, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > >you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then > compile all the > >ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks > out the rest) > >into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as > you have your > >sound module and sound support set as modules or compiled in. > > Just one short question... > I have read all over about the ACPI patch. Is that something > different from > the ACPI options in my kernel config? Can I compile a kernel for ACPI > directly, or do I have to apply a patch for it after > compilation/installation? > > //Ivar > - > ** > Ivar Alm ! Where does Microsoft want to drag you today? ! > Umeå, Sweden ! Do you really want to go there? ! > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.acc.umu.se/~octo > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
> BTW sound worked with Mandrake 9.0. Does it mean their kernel was > patched? This is highly probable (though I believe it is *not* activated by default - did you recompile it?) -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
> > Maybe you forgot to enable the OSS compatibility when compiling the > > alsa drivers (or your modules.conf file is bad). > > In fact, I didn't have OSS support in the kernel. Now I compiled it in > (as a module), but I get the same error. Here is the relevant lsmod > output. > > sound 59244 0 (unused) > snd-intel8x0 11712 0 (unused) > snd-pcm54784 0 [snd-intel8x0] > snd-timer 10816 0 [snd-pcm] > snd-ac97-codec 26816 0 [snd-intel8x0] > snd-mpu401-uart 3296 0 [snd-intel8x0] > snd-rawmidi13664 0 [snd-mpu401-uart] > snd-seq-device 4396 0 [snd-rawmidi] > snd27304 0 [snd-intel8x0 snd-pcm snd-timer > snd-ac97-codec snd-mpu401-uart snd-rawmidi snd-seq-device] > soundcore 3844 2 [sound snd] > > I had to `modprobe sound` manually, as `modprobe snd-intel8x0` doesn't > cause sound.o to load. This is normal, sound.o isn't required by ALSA. See my own module stack: snd-mixer-oss 10624 0 (autoclean) snd-intel8x0 15840 0 (autoclean) snd-pcm54976 0 (autoclean) [snd-intel8x0] snd-timer 10368 0 (autoclean) [snd-pcm] snd-ac97-codec 24880 0 (autoclean) [snd-intel8x0] snd-mpu401-uart 2560 0 (autoclean) [snd-intel8x0] snd-rawmidi12224 0 (autoclean) [snd-mpu401-uart] snd-seq-device 3824 0 (autoclean) [snd-rawmidi] snd24232 0 (autoclean) [snd-mixer-oss snd-intel8x0 snd-pcm snd-timer snd-ac97-codec snd-mpu401-uart snd-rawmidi snd-seq-device] soundcore 3492 1 (autoclean) [snd] It seems that you have snd-mixer-oss missing. Try to load it manually. You may also want to take a look at the relevant section of my modules.conf file (for alsa-0.9.0-rc5, will not work with earlier versions): # SOUND (ALSA) alias char-major-116 snd alias snd-card-0 snd-intel8x0 alias char-major-14 soundcore alias sound-slot-0 snd-card-0 alias sound-service-0-0 snd-mixer-oss alias sound-service-0-1 snd-seq-oss alias sound-service-0-3 snd-pcm-oss alias sound-service-0-8 snd-seq-oss alias sound-service-0-12 snd-pcm-oss options snd major=116 cards_limit=1 device_mode=0666 device_gid=0 device_uid=0 options snd-intel8x0 index=0 id=CARD_0 enable=1 post-install snd-intel8x0 /usr/sbin/alsactl restore Maybe you're missing the sound-service-0-0 line? Note that some of these lines may be obsolete now, I have be updating my alsa configuration from version to version for quite a long time now. If you can't get it working, you may want to follow Jeremy Petzold's advice and use the ACPI patch. It solves many IRQ routing problems on modern laptops and this may be your problem. -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
no no...what you see in the kernel is APCI...it is diffrent than ACPI. - Original Message - From: "Ivar Alm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:05 PM Subject: Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec At 20:24 2002-11-25, Jeremy Petzold wrote: >you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the >ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest) >into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your >sound module and sound support set as modules or compiled in. Just one short question... I have read all over about the ACPI patch. Is that something different from the ACPI options in my kernel config? Can I compile a kernel for ACPI directly, or do I have to apply a patch for it after compilation/installation? //Ivar - ** Ivar Alm ! Where does Microsoft want to drag you today? ! Umeå, Sweden ! Do you really want to go there? ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.acc.umu.se/~octo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:24 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the > ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest) > into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your > sound module and sound support set as modules or compiled in. Which ACPI patch? Google "acpi patch" points to different projects. Is this related to the kernel hanging because of the ALSA driver when the laptop is suspended; or to the problem I'm having right now (lack of sound) ? BTW sound worked with Mandrake 9.0. Does it mean their kernel was patched? Thanks Oleg
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:32 pm, Maximilian Pascher wrote: > Hi Oleg, > do You have some more info about Your hardware? Especially the manufacturer > and type of the Notebook? > > greetz > > Max Max, It's a Fujitsu Lifebook E7110. Oleg
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:03 pm, Jean Delvare wrote: > > I also heard of the reports of people using ALSA on this laptop, so I > > installed alsa-drivers-0.9: `modprobe snd-intel8x0` succeeds, but xmms > > gives an error: "oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): > > No such device" > > > > Any ideas? > > Maybe you forgot to enable the OSS compatibility when compiling the alsa > drivers (or your modules.conf file is bad). In fact, I didn't have OSS support in the kernel. Now I compiled it in (as a module), but I get the same error. Here is the relevant lsmod output. sound 59244 0 (unused) snd-intel8x0 11712 0 (unused) snd-pcm54784 0 [snd-intel8x0] snd-timer 10816 0 [snd-pcm] snd-ac97-codec 26816 0 [snd-intel8x0] snd-mpu401-uart 3296 0 [snd-intel8x0] snd-rawmidi13664 0 [snd-mpu401-uart] snd-seq-device 4396 0 [snd-rawmidi] snd27304 0 [snd-intel8x0 snd-pcm snd-timer snd-ac97-codec snd-mpu401-uart snd-rawmidi snd-seq-device] soundcore 3844 2 [sound snd] I had to `modprobe sound` manually, as `modprobe snd-intel8x0` doesn't cause sound.o to load. All of this is strange because when I briefly tried Mandrake 9.0, the sound worked (somehow). Thanks Oleg
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
On Monday 25 November 2002 21:05, Ivar Alm wrote: > Just one short question... > I have read all over about the ACPI patch. Is that something different from > the ACPI options in my kernel config? Can I compile a kernel for ACPI > directly, or do I have to apply a patch for it after > compilation/installation? You have to apply it in Your kernel source-tree. Get it from http://acpi.sourceforge.net and patch Your kernel... After that You will find an extra menu option for ACPI and Your powermanagement will work. If You don't know how to patch, just ask :-) cheers Max -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GIT(S) dx s: a--- C++ UL P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+ o-- K- w-- O-- M- V- PS+ PE++ Y PGP++ t- 5-- X- R- tv b+(++) DI++ D+ G e* h! r y? --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- GnuPG key available on http://www.linuxforall.de Think about TCPA Don't let entertainment industry cut Your rights! FAQ: English: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/tcpa-faq.html German: http://moon.hipjoint.de/tcpa-palladium-faq-de.html
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
At 20:24 2002-11-25, Jeremy Petzold wrote: you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest) into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your sound module and sound support set as modules or compiled in. Just one short question... I have read all over about the ACPI patch. Is that something different from the ACPI options in my kernel config? Can I compile a kernel for ACPI directly, or do I have to apply a patch for it after compilation/installation? //Ivar - ** Ivar Alm ! Where does Microsoft want to drag you today? ! Umeå, Sweden ! Do you really want to go there? ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.acc.umu.se/~octo
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
Ouch... Better clean my glasses... Or rather get a pair? At 21:39 2002-11-25, Jeremy Petzold wrote: no no...what you see in the kernel is APCI...it is diffrent than ACPI. - Original Message - From: "Ivar Alm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:05 PM Subject: Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec At 20:24 2002-11-25, Jeremy Petzold wrote: >you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the >ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest) >into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your >sound module and sound support set as modules or compiled in. Just one short question... I have read all over about the ACPI patch. Is that something different from the ACPI options in my kernel config? Can I compile a kernel for ACPI directly, or do I have to apply a patch for it after compilation/installation? //Ivar - ** Ivar Alm ! Where does Microsoft want to drag you today? ! Umeå, Sweden ! Do you really want to go there? ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.acc.umu.se/~octo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ** Ivar Alm ! Where does Microsoft want to drag you today? ! Umeå, Sweden ! Do you really want to go there? ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.acc.umu.se/~octo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
On Monday 25 November 2002 19:35, Oleg wrote: > Hi > > I'm trying to get this sound "card" to work with 2.4.18 Woody kernel, and I > tried ac97_codec.o i810_audio.o soundcore.o kernel drivers, which lead to > a very peculiar barely audible sound (like a modulated system beep). > > I also heard of the reports of people using ALSA on this laptop, so I > installed alsa-drivers-0.9: `modprobe snd-intel8x0` succeeds, but xmms > gives an error: "oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): No > such device" > > Any ideas? > > Thanks in advance for your time. > > Oleg > P.S. I'm attaching MS Windows description of the device. > > > [Sound Device] > > ItemValue > NameIntel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > ManufacturerSigmaTel > Status OK > PNP Device ID PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_2485&SUBSYS_117710CF&REV_02\3&61AAA01&0&FD > I/O Port0x1000-0x10FF > I/O Port0x1880-0x18BF > IRQ Channel IRQ 11 > Driver c:\windows\system32\drivers\stac97fj.sys (5.10.7159, 95.98 KB > (98,288 bytes), 11/22/2002 5:12 PM) Hi Oleg, do You have some more info about Your hardware? Especially the manufacturer and type of the Notebook? greetz Max -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GIT(S) dx s: a--- C++ UL P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+ o-- K- w-- O-- M- V- PS+ PE++ Y PGP++ t- 5-- X- R- tv b+(++) DI++ D+ G e* h! r y? --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- GnuPG key available on http://www.linuxforall.de Think about TCPA Don't let entertainment industry cut Your rights! FAQ: English: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/tcpa-faq.html German: http://moon.hipjoint.de/tcpa-palladium-faq-de.html
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest) into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your sound module and sound support set as modules or compiled in. - Original Message - From: "Oleg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ; Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:35 PM Subject: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > Hi > > I'm trying to get this sound "card" to work with 2.4.18 Woody kernel, and I > tried ac97_codec.o i810_audio.o soundcore.o kernel drivers, which lead to a > very peculiar barely audible sound (like a modulated system beep). > > I also heard of the reports of people using ALSA on this laptop, so I > installed alsa-drivers-0.9: `modprobe snd-intel8x0` succeeds, but xmms gives > an error: "oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): No such device" > > Any ideas? > > Thanks in advance for your time. > > Oleg > P.S. I'm attaching MS Windows description of the device. > > > [Sound Device] > > ItemValue > NameIntel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > ManufacturerSigmaTel > Status OK > PNP Device ID PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_2485&SUBSYS_117710CF&REV_02\3&61AAA01&0&FD > I/O Port0x1000-0x10FF > I/O Port0x1880-0x18BF > IRQ Channel IRQ 11 > Driver c:\windows\system32\drivers\stac97fj.sys (5.10.7159, 95.98 KB (98,288 > bytes), 11/22/2002 5:12 PM) > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
> BTW sound worked with Mandrake 9.0. Does it mean their kernel was > patched? This is highly probable (though I believe it is *not* activated by default - did you recompile it?) -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
> I also heard of the reports of people using ALSA on this laptop, so I > installed alsa-drivers-0.9: `modprobe snd-intel8x0` succeeds, but xmms > gives an error: "oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): > No such device" > > Any ideas? Maybe you forgot to enable the OSS compatibility when compiling the alsa drivers (or your modules.conf file is bad). Either fix this (to get the OSS compatibility) or get the XMMS ALSA output plugin. http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/alsa-xmms/ -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
> > Maybe you forgot to enable the OSS compatibility when compiling the > > alsa drivers (or your modules.conf file is bad). > > In fact, I didn't have OSS support in the kernel. Now I compiled it in > (as a module), but I get the same error. Here is the relevant lsmod > output. > > sound 59244 0 (unused) > snd-intel8x0 11712 0 (unused) > snd-pcm54784 0 [snd-intel8x0] > snd-timer 10816 0 [snd-pcm] > snd-ac97-codec 26816 0 [snd-intel8x0] > snd-mpu401-uart 3296 0 [snd-intel8x0] > snd-rawmidi13664 0 [snd-mpu401-uart] > snd-seq-device 4396 0 [snd-rawmidi] > snd27304 0 [snd-intel8x0 snd-pcm snd-timer > snd-ac97-codec snd-mpu401-uart snd-rawmidi snd-seq-device] > soundcore 3844 2 [sound snd] > > I had to `modprobe sound` manually, as `modprobe snd-intel8x0` doesn't > cause sound.o to load. This is normal, sound.o isn't required by ALSA. See my own module stack: snd-mixer-oss 10624 0 (autoclean) snd-intel8x0 15840 0 (autoclean) snd-pcm54976 0 (autoclean) [snd-intel8x0] snd-timer 10368 0 (autoclean) [snd-pcm] snd-ac97-codec 24880 0 (autoclean) [snd-intel8x0] snd-mpu401-uart 2560 0 (autoclean) [snd-intel8x0] snd-rawmidi12224 0 (autoclean) [snd-mpu401-uart] snd-seq-device 3824 0 (autoclean) [snd-rawmidi] snd24232 0 (autoclean) [snd-mixer-oss snd-intel8x0 snd-pcm snd-timer snd-ac97-codec snd-mpu401-uart snd-rawmidi snd-seq-device] soundcore 3492 1 (autoclean) [snd] It seems that you have snd-mixer-oss missing. Try to load it manually. You may also want to take a look at the relevant section of my modules.conf file (for alsa-0.9.0-rc5, will not work with earlier versions): # SOUND (ALSA) alias char-major-116 snd alias snd-card-0 snd-intel8x0 alias char-major-14 soundcore alias sound-slot-0 snd-card-0 alias sound-service-0-0 snd-mixer-oss alias sound-service-0-1 snd-seq-oss alias sound-service-0-3 snd-pcm-oss alias sound-service-0-8 snd-seq-oss alias sound-service-0-12 snd-pcm-oss options snd major=116 cards_limit=1 device_mode=0666 device_gid=0 device_uid=0 options snd-intel8x0 index=0 id=CARD_0 enable=1 post-install snd-intel8x0 /usr/sbin/alsactl restore Maybe you're missing the sound-service-0-0 line? Note that some of these lines may be obsolete now, I have be updating my alsa configuration from version to version for quite a long time now. If you can't get it working, you may want to follow Jeremy Petzold's advice and use the ACPI patch. It solves many IRQ routing problems on modern laptops and this may be your problem. -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
no no...what you see in the kernel is APCI...it is diffrent than ACPI. - Original Message - From: "Ivar Alm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:05 PM Subject: Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec At 20:24 2002-11-25, Jeremy Petzold wrote: >you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the >ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest) >into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your >sound module and sound support set as modules or compiled in. Just one short question... I have read all over about the ACPI patch. Is that something different from the ACPI options in my kernel config? Can I compile a kernel for ACPI directly, or do I have to apply a patch for it after compilation/installation? //Ivar - ** Ivar Alm ! Where does Microsoft want to drag you today? ! Umeå, Sweden ! Do you really want to go there? ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.acc.umu.se/~octo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:24 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the > ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest) > into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your > sound module and sound support set as modules or compiled in. Which ACPI patch? Google "acpi patch" points to different projects. Is this related to the kernel hanging because of the ALSA driver when the laptop is suspended; or to the problem I'm having right now (lack of sound) ? BTW sound worked with Mandrake 9.0. Does it mean their kernel was patched? Thanks Oleg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:32 pm, Maximilian Pascher wrote: > Hi Oleg, > do You have some more info about Your hardware? Especially the manufacturer > and type of the Notebook? > > greetz > > Max Max, It's a Fujitsu Lifebook E7110. Oleg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:03 pm, Jean Delvare wrote: > > I also heard of the reports of people using ALSA on this laptop, so I > > installed alsa-drivers-0.9: `modprobe snd-intel8x0` succeeds, but xmms > > gives an error: "oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): > > No such device" > > > > Any ideas? > > Maybe you forgot to enable the OSS compatibility when compiling the alsa > drivers (or your modules.conf file is bad). In fact, I didn't have OSS support in the kernel. Now I compiled it in (as a module), but I get the same error. Here is the relevant lsmod output. sound 59244 0 (unused) snd-intel8x0 11712 0 (unused) snd-pcm54784 0 [snd-intel8x0] snd-timer 10816 0 [snd-pcm] snd-ac97-codec 26816 0 [snd-intel8x0] snd-mpu401-uart 3296 0 [snd-intel8x0] snd-rawmidi13664 0 [snd-mpu401-uart] snd-seq-device 4396 0 [snd-rawmidi] snd27304 0 [snd-intel8x0 snd-pcm snd-timer snd-ac97-codec snd-mpu401-uart snd-rawmidi snd-seq-device] soundcore 3844 2 [sound snd] I had to `modprobe sound` manually, as `modprobe snd-intel8x0` doesn't cause sound.o to load. All of this is strange because when I briefly tried Mandrake 9.0, the sound worked (somehow). Thanks Oleg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
On Monday 25 November 2002 21:05, Ivar Alm wrote: > Just one short question... > I have read all over about the ACPI patch. Is that something different from > the ACPI options in my kernel config? Can I compile a kernel for ACPI > directly, or do I have to apply a patch for it after > compilation/installation? You have to apply it in Your kernel source-tree. Get it from http://acpi.sourceforge.net and patch Your kernel... After that You will find an extra menu option for ACPI and Your powermanagement will work. If You don't know how to patch, just ask :-) cheers Max -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GIT(S) dx s: a--- C++ UL P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+ o-- K- w-- O-- M- V- PS+ PE++ Y PGP++ t- 5-- X- R- tv b+(++) DI++ D+ G e* h! r y? --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- GnuPG key available on http://www.linuxforall.de Think about TCPA Don't let entertainment industry cut Your rights! FAQ: English: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/tcpa-faq.html German: http://moon.hipjoint.de/tcpa-palladium-faq-de.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
At 20:24 2002-11-25, Jeremy Petzold wrote: you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest) into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your sound module and sound support set as modules or compiled in. Just one short question... I have read all over about the ACPI patch. Is that something different from the ACPI options in my kernel config? Can I compile a kernel for ACPI directly, or do I have to apply a patch for it after compilation/installation? //Ivar - ** Ivar Alm ! Where does Microsoft want to drag you today? ! Umeå, Sweden ! Do you really want to go there? ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.acc.umu.se/~octo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
On Monday 25 November 2002 19:35, Oleg wrote: > Hi > > I'm trying to get this sound "card" to work with 2.4.18 Woody kernel, and I > tried ac97_codec.o i810_audio.o soundcore.o kernel drivers, which lead to > a very peculiar barely audible sound (like a modulated system beep). > > I also heard of the reports of people using ALSA on this laptop, so I > installed alsa-drivers-0.9: `modprobe snd-intel8x0` succeeds, but xmms > gives an error: "oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): No > such device" > > Any ideas? > > Thanks in advance for your time. > > Oleg > P.S. I'm attaching MS Windows description of the device. > > > [Sound Device] > > ItemValue > NameIntel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > ManufacturerSigmaTel > Status OK > PNP Device ID PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_2485&SUBSYS_117710CF&REV_02\3&61AAA01&0&FD > I/O Port0x1000-0x10FF > I/O Port0x1880-0x18BF > IRQ Channel IRQ 11 > Driver c:\windows\system32\drivers\stac97fj.sys (5.10.7159, 95.98 KB > (98,288 bytes), 11/22/2002 5:12 PM) Hi Oleg, do You have some more info about Your hardware? Especially the manufacturer and type of the Notebook? greetz Max -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GIT(S) dx s: a--- C++ UL P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+ o-- K- w-- O-- M- V- PS+ PE++ Y PGP++ t- 5-- X- R- tv b+(++) DI++ D+ G e* h! r y? --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- GnuPG key available on http://www.linuxforall.de Think about TCPA Don't let entertainment industry cut Your rights! FAQ: English: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/tcpa-faq.html German: http://moon.hipjoint.de/tcpa-palladium-faq-de.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest) into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your sound module and sound support set as modules or compiled in. - Original Message - From: "Oleg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:35 PM Subject: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > Hi > > I'm trying to get this sound "card" to work with 2.4.18 Woody kernel, and I > tried ac97_codec.o i810_audio.o soundcore.o kernel drivers, which lead to a > very peculiar barely audible sound (like a modulated system beep). > > I also heard of the reports of people using ALSA on this laptop, so I > installed alsa-drivers-0.9: `modprobe snd-intel8x0` succeeds, but xmms gives > an error: "oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): No such device" > > Any ideas? > > Thanks in advance for your time. > > Oleg > P.S. I'm attaching MS Windows description of the device. > > > [Sound Device] > > ItemValue > NameIntel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > ManufacturerSigmaTel > Status OK > PNP Device ID PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_2485&SUBSYS_117710CF&REV_02\3&61AAA01&0&FD > I/O Port0x1000-0x10FF > I/O Port0x1880-0x18BF > IRQ Channel IRQ 11 > Driver c:\windows\system32\drivers\stac97fj.sys (5.10.7159, 95.98 KB (98,288 > bytes), 11/22/2002 5:12 PM) > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
> I also heard of the reports of people using ALSA on this laptop, so I > installed alsa-drivers-0.9: `modprobe snd-intel8x0` succeeds, but xmms > gives an error: "oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): > No such device" > > Any ideas? Maybe you forgot to enable the OSS compatibility when compiling the alsa drivers (or your modules.conf file is bad). Either fix this (to get the OSS compatibility) or get the XMMS ALSA output plugin. http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/alsa-xmms/ -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
