Re: FWD: Analog licence violates DFSG

> It does not say only "any use ..is the sole responsability.." > (disclaimer) it adds " is forbidden..". > > Any body who has been in far and strange countries knows how "local > law" could be stupid, oppressive and casual, so since 'it is > forbidden' it prevent the use in such countries where

Re: FWD: Analog licence violates DFSG

On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 03:24:19PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: > Branden Robinson wrote: > > Look up "tort" in a legal dictionary. > > Who gave this man a legal dictionary? What? -- G. Branden Robinson |Murphy's Guide to Science: Debian GNU/Linux|If it's green or

Re: FWD: Analog licence violates DFSG

Branden Robinson wrote: > Look up "tort" in a legal dictionary. Who gave this man a legal dictionary? -- see shy jo

2 questions about leocad

Hello, I am trying to package LeoCAD for debian. LeoCAD is a CAD program that uses plastic bricks to model figures (no specific brand :) LeoCAD uses the official parts library from ldraw as well as several unofficial parts. 1) There is no stated l

Re: Irony of RSA Encryption

This is not legal advice, no attorney-client relationship is established, etc. etc. From: Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Paul Serice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: debian-legal Mailing List Subject: Re: Irony of RSA Encryption Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 15:48:54 -0400 On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 02:14:

Re: Python 1.6 license DFSG free ?

This is not legal advice, no attorney-client relationship is established, etc. etc. My understanding is that Virginia law would be applied by the Albanian court (provided, among other things, jurisdiction can be obtained in Albania and provided the Albanian court will accept the contractual ch

Re: Irony of RSA Encryption

On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 04:17:35AM -0500, Paul Serice wrote: > Under a GPL regime ... This is not the right place to discuss your GPL fantasies. The right place is the gnu-misc-discuss mailing list. Thanks, -- Raul

Re: avifile

On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 10:36:43AM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote: > >This project includes GSM 6.1 audio decoder, which is taken from XAnim. > > XAnim is licensed as 'free for non-commercial use' - not compatible with > > (L)GPL. That part needs to be rewritten to resolve this issue. > > > >

Re: avifile

/* quoted in full so this gets on the write list */ On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 04:27:13PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > Hi ppl, > > Has anyone taken a look at packaging avifile, the X/QT AVI player, available > from http://divx.euro.ru/ ? I've been using it recently, and I could package > it easily, b

Re: Irony of RSA Encryption

David Starner wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 01:48:00AM -0500, Paul Serice wrote: > > So, that's the "case in point": Under the RSA example, the current > > legal regime, for all its imperfections, results in software and ideas > > that are freer than what you would have under a pure GPL legal

Re: Irony of RSA Encryption

Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote: > > Do you understand that patent and copyright are two completely > different areas? In the "pure GNU GPL" world you describe, there > would be no patents, so the RSA algorithm would have been free from > the beginning. MMM Maybe . . . "Free" in the GPL sense: yes, by

Re: Irony of RSA Encryption

Samuel Hocevar wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 16, 2000, Paul Serice wrote: > > Samuel Hocevar wrote: > >Next time I'd be glad if you didn't send my *private* E-mails to a > mailing list without asking me. I don't suppose debian-legal was set up > for your personal rants/trolls, and I have no intentio