문서번호:21가마-008977
수 신:대표이사님
발 신:사무기관리조합 최진범
참 조:컴퓨터/복사기/사무기/LCD/부동산 처분건
◈ 안녕하십니까? 사무기관리조합입니다.중소기업협참조로 연락드리오니 회사및
직원분들이 필요하시면 참조하시기 바랍니다.(대리점
정리하는 사무기 처분건입니다)
◈ 저희 사무기관리조합은 사무기기 대리점관리 및
대리점 정리시
2) A user of the modified Vim must be able to see that it was modified,
at
least in the version information and in the intro screen.
The GPL has a similar kind of requirement, but this is more specific,
hence not GPL-compatible.
I could not find the similar
Because the company I worked for does not allow my work to be distributed
outside of the company, and that conflicts with the GPL.
This is a complete misunderstanding of the GPL. It does not require
anyone to release modified versions at all.
Hmm, I could add a 3e, which explicitly says that distribution under the
GPL is allowed, but only if the changes are also under the GPL license.
That would at least solve the problem of linking with the GPM library.
That might work--I'd have to see the precise wording before I could
Richard Stallman wrote:
Because the company I worked for does not allow my work to be distributed
outside of the company, and that conflicts with the GPL.
This is a complete misunderstanding of the GPL. It does not require
anyone to release modified versions at all.
The GPL
Richard Stallman wrote:
2) A user of the modified Vim must be able to see that it was
modified, at
least in the version information and in the intro screen.
The GPL has a similar kind of requirement, but this is more specific,
hence not
Richard Stallman wrote:
Hmm, I could add a 3e, which explicitly says that distribution under the
GPL is allowed, but only if the changes are also under the GPL license.
That would at least solve the problem of linking with the GPM library.
That might work--I'd have to see the
Hi,
On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 11:24, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Richard Stallman wrote:
In section 2:
a) You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices
stating that you changed the files and the date of any change.
The problem with this is that a user of Vim may never
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:24:15AM +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
This is in the new draft:
e) When the GNU General Public License applies to the changes, you can
distribute the modified Vim under the GNU General Public License.
I'll send out a new draft when some other
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:24:15AM +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
This is in the new draft:
e) When the GNU General Public License applies to the changes, you can
distribute the modified Vim under the GNU General Public License.
This is wholly satisfactory to me, at least. To
Walter Landry wrote:
Andrea Mennucc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the problem: Debian Alpha is lacking a good browser
the solution: there is a version of Netscape 4.7-4
that was compiled by Compaq for Tru64; this version is
also distributed by RedHat for Alpha; some people have
passed it thru
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:24:14AM +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Richard Stallman wrote:
Because the company I worked for does not allow my work to be
distributed
outside of the company, and that conflicts with the GPL.
This is a complete misunderstanding of the GPL. It does
12 matches
Mail list logo
