Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:24:15AM +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
This is in the new draft:
e) When the GNU General Public License applies to the changes, you
can
distribute the modified Vim under the GNU General Public License.
I'll send out
Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 11:24, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Richard Stallman wrote:
In section 2:
a) You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices
stating that you changed the files and the date of any change.
The problem with this is that
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 10:54:30AM +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
e) When the GNU General Public License applies to the changes, you
can
distribute the modified Vim under the GNU General Public
License.
What if I have a copy with no changes at all, and want to
I am preparing a paper on lobbying for (and against)
European
directive on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and
related rights in the information society. I have a few questions -
maybe not really specific but I do not need legal analysis.
1. Was there any considerable lobbying
I am preparing a paper on lobbying for (and against) European directive on
the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the
information society. I have a few questions - maybe not really specific but
I do not need legal analysis.
1. Was there any considerable
Hello Rafal,
Maybe you will find this paper written by João Miguel Neves interesting:
http://silvaneves.org/eucd/eucd-fs.en.html
Cheers.
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 01:40:59PM +0100, Rafal Prochniak wrote:
I am preparing a paper on lobbying for (and against) European directive on
the
I want to create a unicode truetype font based on the Unicode code charts to
distribute them under GPL (and package them for Debian). I am not sure whether
I can do this or not since the PDF files include the following sentence under
Terms of use:
You may freely use these code charts for
Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 10:54:30AM +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
e) When the GNU General Public License applies to the changes,
you can
distribute the modified Vim under the GNU General Public
License.
What if I have a copy with no
What do you mean by using them as a starting point to build a new font? If
you mean that you will look at the glyphs to have shape ideas, I think that
is find. If you mean extract the shapes from the PDF to put them in your
font with little modifications, I highly doubt it. The Unicode charts are
What do you mean by using them as a starting point to build a new font? If
you mean that you will look at the glyphs to have shape ideas, I think that
is find. If you mean extract the shapes from the PDF to put them in your
font with little modifications, I highly doubt it. The Unicode charts
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 02:18:18PM -0300, Eduardo Tr?pani wrote:
Well, if that approach does not work I guess I am going to try to merge
existing free fonts. I am having a hard time finding true type free fonts
with a good Unicode coverage and acceptable quality.
How much of Unicode is
I think there should be a (at least low quality) free unicode font made
available by the Unicode Consortium.
What about unifont? http://czyborra.com/unifont/
Well, if that approach does not work I guess I am going to try to merge
existing free fonts. I am having a hard time finding true
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 04:28:57PM +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
But if there were no changes, e) isn't an option, so we're not allowed
to change it to the GPL, so GPM's license restricts it.
That's not a problem, because without changes the first paragraph
applies, and it's compatible with
I do not know anything about how X fonts work, or what you are trying to do,
but maybe your energy would be better spent adding a mechanism to
transparently fetch glyphs from various fonts when the currently selected
font does not have glyphs for some codepoints.
Well, I am trying to have a
What if I have a copy with no changes at all, and want to distribute it
linked against GPM? I have to make a change (so it's a modified Vim)?
Linking against GPM counts as making a change in the program as a whole.
So that does not raise an issue.
However, one thing that should be noted
This is wholly satisfactory to me, at least. To address one of your
other concerns, I don't think it would hurt to add the following
sentence:
You are encouraged to license your changes under the Vim license as
well, and submit them to the Vim maintainer for possible
Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What this means is that it is indirectly self-contradictory to say
You can distribute modified versions under the GPL but not the
original version.
Ah, yes this is a good point often missed.
Another way to put it is that free software must permit
17 matches
Mail list logo
