Scripsit Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Q.1: No copyright, no author name, no license notice!
[Frequent in Makefile, header files and simple source files]
The licence will be the license in COPYING at the main dir?
thus default GNU GPL and only GPL version 2, right?
I believe
Scripsit Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As a special exception, if other files instantiate templates or use
macros or inline functions from these files, or you compile these
files and link them with other works to produce a work based on these
files, these files do not by themselves
Scripsit Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Q.12:
linux/fs/reiserfs/README:
Source code files that contain the phrase licensing governed by
reiserfs/README are governed files throughout this file. Governed
files are licensed under the GPL. The portions of them owned by Hans
Reiser, or
Q.6:
: /* inflate.c -- Not copyrighted 1992 by Mark Adler
: version c10p1, 10 January 1993 */
Not copyrighted == public domain?
In practise, yes. In theory, not copyrighted is nonsense as
copyright is not a verb, nor an action that someone applies to the
code. A court
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 10:08, Henning Makholm wrote:
All portions of governed files not labeled otherwise are owned by Hans
Reiser, and by adding your code to it, widely distributing it to
others or sending us a patch, and leaving the sentence in stating that
licensing is governed by the
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:54:27PM -0500, David Turner wrote:
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 10:08, Henning Makholm wrote:
All portions of governed files not labeled otherwise are owned by Hans
Reiser, and by adding your code to it, widely distributing it to
others or sending us a patch, and
6 matches
Mail list logo
