Hello, ...
I came on a program that is distributed under the GPL with the addition
of the following exception :
Derivative works must not remove the original author's copyright
notices, name or comments from source code and documentation. Doing
so will violate the license.
I had the
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
Derivative works must not remove the original author's copyright
notices, name or comments from source code and documentation. Doing
so will violate the license.
I had the impression that the GPL already provides for forcing the
original
Scripsit Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I had the impression that the GPL already provides for forcing the
original copyright notice and author name to stay in the modified work,
but could not pinpoint the exact place of it.
I'd point to clause 1 (which is referred to from clause 2): keep
At least one situation comes to mind where it might happen: If I wanted
to publish a collection of HOWTOs, e.g., from the LDP. If every one of
them included front and back cover texts, that'd be a mountain.
There is no difficulty at all here. This collection would be an
aggregate,
Hi RMS,
On Mittwoch 28 Mai 2003 00:40, Richard Stallman wrote:
A political essay is (typically) written by certain
persons to persuade the public of a certain position.
If it is modified, it does not do its job. So it makes
sense, socially, to say that these cannot be modified.
Then, why
Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, other people purporting to act on behalf of the FSF do.
Did they really claim to be speaking for the FSF, or were they just
expressing support for the FSF? Anyone can do the latter, but we did
not ask anyone to speak for the FSF
6 matches
Mail list logo
