O Luns, 4 de Agosto de 2003 ás 00:21:59 +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS escribía:
(L) Public Property: You may do anything you want with this work
provided that you inform all recipients that all derived works must
likewise be Public Property.
... with no additional restrictions.
--
Joe Wreschnig said:
If someone adds proprietary code to BSD-licensed code, however, you can
later extract the free code (assuming you have access to the code of
the now-proprietary program), and use it in something else. Once
proprietary (invariant) sections are added to something under the
Joe Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joe Wreschnig said:
If someone adds proprietary code to BSD-licensed code, however, you can
later extract the free code (assuming you have access to the code of
the now-proprietary program), and use it in something else. Once
proprietary (invariant)
Hi again,
It's me, Katrina from Ecstasea Yacht Charter! I just wanted to say thanks for
pre-registering with us and that we are now 100% up and running! I can't wait
to see you on deck and show you my new bikini!
In case you don't remember my phone numbers for reservations, you can now
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 02:10:37AM +0200, Sergey V. Spiridonov wrote:
If one does not see the difference between program and documentation, it
is very hard to explain why they do not need the same kind of freedoms.
If one cannot coherently and usefully *describe* the difference between
Dear Legal Gurus,
There is a semi-official patch set for the IJG jpeg code:
ftp://ftp.imagemagick.org/pub/ImageMagick/delegates/ljpeg-6b.tar.gz
which adds support for lossless jpeg files.
The archive contains three files:
ljpeg-6b.patch and two copies of a test image, in both lossless
jpeg and
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:22:27AM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
Personally, I don't like it. Use of DFSG4 (beyond The license
may require... a different name) isn't really encouraged, and if
one can't distributed modified binaries because there are no
binaries, the software feels very
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:21:59AM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
* The compulsory change log is similarly inconvenient, though everyone
seems to ignore that part of the GPL anyway.
Not everyone.
apt-get source xfree86
vi xfree86-*/debian/local/xserver-wrapper.c
--
G. Branden Robinson
Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 02:10:37AM +0200, Sergey V. Spiridonov wrote:
If one does not see the difference between program and documentation, it
is very hard to explain why they do not need the same kind of freedoms.
If one cannot coherently and usefully *describe* the
Scripsit Lynn Winebarger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is circular. You are only routing around DFSG's inconvenient
restrictions if those restrictions apply (by virtue of being software).
It can also be turned around - why claim everything is software except
to force DSFG restrictions where
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:21:59AM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
* Though it's generally a good thing that the GPL requires me to
provide source, this requirement gives less benefit in the case of
text and can have some unpleasant consequences. For example, if
someone makes a derived work
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 08:49:07PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
This is why, when using the GPL for things which are not clearly
program source code, you must always specify what the preferred form
for modification is (append it to the license declaration, which
should be just below the
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 08:49:07PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:21:59AM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
* Though it's generally a good thing that the GPL requires me to
provide source, this requirement gives less benefit in the case of
text and can have some
Brian T. Sniffen said:
Joe Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joe Wreschnig said:
If someone adds proprietary code to BSD-licensed code, however, you
can later extract the free code (assuming you have access to the code
of the now-proprietary program), and use it in something else. Once
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 06:24:24PM +0100, Steve King wrote:
There is a semi-official patch set for the IJG jpeg code:
ftp://ftp.imagemagick.org/pub/ImageMagick/delegates/ljpeg-6b.tar.gz
which adds support for lossless jpeg files.
There is no Copyright, README, or similar file with a license
15 matches
Mail list logo
