Re: [Fwd: Re: Since you designed the Debian 'swirl' logo...]

2004-01-15 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] This will be of interest to anyone wanting to follow up on unauthorized use of the Debian swirl logo. We have a statement from its creator that the swirl was created from scratch. I'm not entirely convinced that his answer is applicable to the

Re: ckermit: license advice

2004-01-15 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Ian Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] (A) The C-Kermit software, in source and/or binary form, may be included WITHOUT EXPLICIT LICENSE in distributions of OPERATING SYSTEMS that have OSI (Open Source Initiative, www.opensource.org) approved licenses, even if non-Open-Source

Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?

2004-01-15 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Sven Luther wrote: Yep, upstream has already agreed to modify licence, probably to either LGPL or to GPL/LGPL+QPL dual licence. I asked them what do they care about dual licence, since the files are no use without emacs, and i was told about an hypothetic non-GPLed emacs

Re: Quake WADs (was: Packaging Linuxant's driverloader?)

2004-01-15 Thread Andrew Saunders
Joey Hess wrote: There is a project on sourceforge that has produced a usable set of quake WADs. I tried it, it works without needing the shareware WADs, and the license is free. I forget the name of the project. http://openquartz.sourceforge.net/ -- Andrew Saunders

Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?

2004-01-15 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:54:16PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 07:33:34PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote: Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Måns Rullgård wrote: Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?

2004-01-15 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] If the .el source files use copyrightable material from emacs, be it copyrightable APIs, Since when is an API protected by copyright? And where? -- Henning Makholm*Jeg* tænker *strax* på kirkemødet i