Inquary Footbags(Please don't ignore)

2004-05-20 Thread staffsports (Pakistan since 1979 )
Dear Sir/Madam. We are exports and we export all kinds of (Foot bags.) for 1 to 122 panelis our product already stored. We are pleased to introduce ourselves as quality ( Foot bags.) manufacturing company with more than (10)years experience in manufacturing and export of (Foot bags)

Requiring registration of GPL software

2004-05-20 Thread Danilo Piazzalunga
Hello, Sorry if this is not quite in-topic for debian-legal. I run into E4[1], a collection of Matlab functions, distributed under the GPL. However, the software can be only downloaded as a zip file protected by a password, which you can get only by contacting the authors: this effectively

Re: Requiring registration of GPL software

2004-05-20 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Danilo Piazzalunga wrote: Hello, Sorry if this is not quite in-topic for debian-legal. I run into E4[1], a collection of Matlab functions, distributed under the GPL. However, the software can be only downloaded as a zip file protected by a password, which you can get only by contacting the

Re: Requiring registration of GPL software

2004-05-20 Thread Humberto Massa
@ 20/05/2004 10:46 : wrote Danilo Piazzalunga : Hello, Sorry if this is not quite in-topic for debian-legal. I run into E4[1], a collection of Matlab functions, distributed under the GPL. However, the software can be only downloaded as a zip file protected by a password, which you can

Re: Requiring registration of GPL software

2004-05-20 Thread Michael D. Crawford
Whether the E4 developers are doing wrong depends on who holds the copyright. If it's all their own code, and there is no other GPLed source included (that is copyright by someone else), the E4 developers have the right to do this. The license they are granting you specifies what you may do

Re: Requiring registration of GPL software

2004-05-20 Thread Humberto Massa
@ 20/05/2004 12:04 : wrote Michael D. Crawford : Whether the E4 developers are doing wrong depends on who holds the copyright. If it's all their own code, and there is no other GPLed source included (that is copyright by someone else), the E4 developers have the right to do this. The

Re: Requiring registration of GPL software

2004-05-20 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Michael D. Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whether the E4 developers are doing wrong depends on who holds the copyright. However, if E4 is not all their own code, I would say this is a GPL violation. Even if it is not all their own code, it is fine with the GPL. They have complete

IBM documentation license

2004-05-20 Thread Eduard Bloch
Hello, I have problems interpreting the following copyright statement which covers the documenting of the ICU library from IBM (which itself is free). IMHO it is non-free, however it is full of juristical english and may be acceptable for main if one can extract the relevant parts from all the

Re: Requiring registration of GPL software

2004-05-20 Thread Humberto Massa
@ 20/05/2004 10:46 : wrote Danilo Piazzalunga : Hello, Sorry if this is not quite in-topic for debian-legal. I run into E4[1], a collection of Matlab functions, distributed under the GPL. However, the software can be only downloaded as a zip file protected by a password, which you can

Re: Requiring registration of GPL software

2004-05-20 Thread Danilo Piazzalunga
Henning Makholm wrote: Indeed, this is excactly the policy that most of us applies to _foreign_ free software that happens to be in our possession. For example, I have on my computer the source for a work derived from (a rather old release of) the Linux kernel, and I'm licensed to distribute

Re: IBM documentation license

2004-05-20 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] IMHO it is non-free, however it is full of juristical english and may be acceptable for main if one can extract the relevant parts from all the blah, blah. No, this parts pretty much kills everything without even trying to make sense of the rest:

Re: The draft Position statement on the GFDL

2004-05-20 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Henning Makholm wrote: Scripsit Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] We have allowed clauses of the fairly narrow form You must not do thing X with this work if it is illegal to do so in your jurisdiction before, though I don't care for such stupid clauses. If we have, we shouldn't have.

Re: IBM documentation license

2004-05-20 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Eduard Bloch wrote: Hello, I have problems interpreting the following copyright statement which covers the documenting of the ICU library from IBM (which itself is free). IMHO it is non-free, however it is full of juristical english and may be acceptable for main if one can extract the

Re: Requiring registration of GPL software

2004-05-20 Thread Josh Triplett
Humberto Massa wrote: MatLab, itself, seems to be non-free. So, even if debian packages this, it should go into contrib. Unless it works with GNU Octave, in which case it could go to main. - Josh Triplett

FORMAS DE CONTACTAR CON EL SE RVICIO DE ATENCI?N AL CLIENTE

2004-05-20 Thread facturacion
Estimado cliente: Hemos recibido de su direcci?n de correo electr?nico un mensaje con el siguiente asunto: Do you? Le indicamos que el servicio de atenci?n al cliente no responde a correos electr?nicos enviados a esta direcci?n. Para contactar con el