Re: latex2html goes GPL? [was: Re: Let's stop feeding the NVidia cuckoo]

2005-03-07 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 08:45:21PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: Actually, a simple email from the upstream author has been considered in the past to be sufficient authorization for a license change. If upstream were to send an email saying something to the effect of I hereby relicense all

Re: PHP non-free or wrongly named?

2005-03-07 Thread Martin Schulze
Martin Schulze wrote: I've been informed about details of the PHP license: For php3: 5. The name PHP must not be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without prior written permission from the PHP Development Team. This does not apply to add-on

Re: PHP non-free or wrongly named?

2005-03-07 Thread Gervase Markham
Martin Schulze wrote: I've sent this letter to the PHP group: Dear authors, we are a group of developers that build up an entire GNU/Linux system based on the Linux kernel, GNU utilities and a lot of other software. It is named Debian GNU/Linux

Re: PHP non-free or wrongly named?

2005-03-07 Thread Lewis Jardine
Michael Below wrote: Here's the license except that left us wondering: 4. Products derived from this software may not be called PHP, nor may PHP appear in their name, without prior written permission from [EMAIL PROTECTED] You may indicate that your software works in conjunction with