I need to talk to you please. I want us to be together. I can't get you and us
out of my mind. My webcam is on right now come to my site and talk to me. I
can't wait to see you.
http://xelytu.sugarburnett.info/cs3/
___
Julian finite spiny ouch
[I am continually amazed by the amount of effort that people will
exert to avoid fixing bugs, even when that effort exceeds the amount
required to fix the bug]
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 05:27:57PM -0500, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
There are two areas where I think the write-up is a little more
quote who=Evan Prodromou date=2005-03-27 12:01:55 -0500
There are two areas where I think the write-up is a little more
harsh/extreme than it should be (this is a critique that has been
passed to me through SPI's lawyer and others who have looked at an
earlier draft).
I'm surprised by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general we should distinguish the types of problems we have with
the license and separate them into a few categories:
Good work. Thank you for trying to add some sanity.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
quote who=[EMAIL PROTECTED] date=2005-03-27 13:37:20 -0500
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 05:27:57PM -0500, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
In general we should distinguish the types of problems we have with
the license and separate them into a few categories:
- Real limitations on freedom that seem
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 02:13:46 +0100 Lewis Jardine wrote:
Francesco Poli wrote:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:27:57 -0500 Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
[anti-DRM clause]
In terms of suggesting a textual fix, how about:
You may not distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or
publicly
David Mandelberg wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing a backup program for GNOME on Debian-ish distros (specifically
Debian and Ubuntu) and I want the some of the documentation to be public
domain,
however I can't find any good resources on how to relinquish copyright.
The closest thing I've found so
Henri Sivonen wrote:
You do not have to provide a copy of the Work or the Derivative Work to
everyone, but when you do provide a copy to someone, you must not take
measures the circumvention of which would be both illegal in the
supported jurisdictions and required for exercising the rights
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 12:30:20PM -0500, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
It is entirely possible that some licensor could go to court and say
I used the CC licenses in the belief that this was prohibited, and
with the intent to prohibit it. There is nothing to use in defence
against this.
On Sunday 27 March 2005 11:21 am, David Mandelberg wrote:
think is relevant to copyright law and I definitely don't want in the docs:
Dedicator makes this dedication for the benefit of the public at large
and to the detriment of the Dedicator's heirs and successors.
(the detriment part
10 matches
Mail list logo
