On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 20:42:17 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Every book in my book shelf is software?
If you digitalize it, yes.
AFAIK software only refers to programs, not to arbitrary sequences of
bytes. An MP3 file isn't software. Although it surely isn't hardware
either.
--
Giuseppe
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 08:07:03PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
The way you stop someone from distributing part of your
work is by arguing
that the work they are distributing is a derivative work of
your work and
they had no right to *make* it in the first place. See, for
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 11:51:56AM -0400, Evan Prodromou wrote:
I got email from Lawrence Lessig this week that their new general
counsel, Mia Garlick, has been reviewing the debian-legal summary and
will have a response for us by 8 April.
So, another update: I got email from LL on Friday. He
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:29:58 -0300 Humberto Massa wrote:
my suggestion:
You may not distribute, publicly display, publicly
perform, or publicly digitally perform the Work with
any technological measures that prevent the recipient
from exercising the rights
Scripsit Humberto Massa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henning Makholm wrote:
Yes I would. Linking forms a tighter coupling than just
placing the two parts side by side on a filesystem designed
for general storage of byte streams. There is more to say
about the situation than the naked fact that that
Scripsit David Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, then you cannot legally copy it at all, because it contains
part of the original author's copyrighted work and therefore can only
legally be copied with the permission of the author.
The way you stop someone from distributing part of
Scripsit Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 04:56:50AM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
Yes I would. Linking forms a tighter coupling than just placing the
two parts side by side on a filesystem designed for general storage of
byte streams. There is more to say about the
Scripsit Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 03:10:43AM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Humberto Massa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After a *lot* of discussion, it was deliberated on d-l that
this is not that tricky at all, and that the mere
aggregation clause applies to the
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 01:18:11PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
Well that's the problem. While copyright law does permit you to restrict
the right to create derivative works, it doesn't permit you to restrict the
distribution of lawfully created derivative works to licensees of the
On Sunday 10 April 2005 01:18 pm, David Schwartz wrote:
You could do that be means of a contract, but I don't think you could it
do by means of a copyright license. The problem is that there is no right
to control the distribution of derivative works for you to withhold from
me.
and
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 01:18:11PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
Well that's the problem. While copyright law does permit
you to restrict
the right to create derivative works, it doesn't permit you to
restrict the
distribution of lawfully created derivative works to licensees of the
11 matches
Mail list logo
