For professional documents use professional software...
http://ycqo.4bq1734f1e4bj5m.fgbasvbk.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have just submitted some comments on the Scottish licence draft
240405 at http://www.jonathanmitchell.info/cc/cc_sco_licence.html
It is interesting to notice that the authorship problems are not
present in this licence (as far as I noticed), but the DRM one is
and the trademark terms are
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 17:04 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Thanks for the comments everyone. I'll get this sorted asap and send an
ITP in the next week or two.
Well, it took longer than expected, but its done :) Together with the
original author (Manfred Winterhoff) and the NetBSD maintainer (Ben
Penis Growth Patches are here!
http://www.terima.net/ss/
Experience more powerful orgasms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
They want their trademarks stripped from modified
code that is essentially different in intent and purpose from the
original code.
Well, that's fine; we don't want to use their trademarks for things which
aren't designed to work with their
Quoting Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Florian Weimer wrote:
QPL is usually considered free, but its use is discouraged. An
additional exception, as granted by OCaml for example, can improve
things.
Even though the license says this:
You must ensure that all recipients of the
On 5/23/05, Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/23/05, Michael K. Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As long as you modify copyright cases to claims of license under
copyright, I'm good with that. Contract law is not used to resolve
any issue other than the validity and scope of a
On 5/24/05, Michael K. Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True. Replace that non-sentence with:
By license, I mean the usage of the word in a copyright law context
-- i. e. (non-)exclusive copyright license, a term in a contract --
and not any statutory or judicially created defense such as
Hello,
Thank you for expressing interest in Rolex Replica watches.
This opportunity to offer you our fine selection
of Italian/Swiss crafted Rolex Timepieces.
You can view our large selection of Rolexes
(including Breitling, Tag Heuer, Cartier etc)
You are guaranteed of lowest prices and
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Hi Roberto!
You wrote:
Per Branden's request, I am forwarding this to -legal.
FSF says that the 3-clause BSD-type license is GPL-compatible.
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/wx4j/modules/wx4j/LICENSE.TXT?rev=1.2view=markup
ddd
This is not a 3-clause BSD
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 03:53:29PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I disagree with that. Debian is an online organisation and discussion
and decision need to happen online. Noone is prevented to read
debian-legal.
People are heavily discouraged
Hi Roberto!
You wrote:
Per Branden's request, I am forwarding this to -legal.
FSF says that the 3-clause BSD-type license is GPL-compatible.
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/wx4j/modules/wx4j/LICENSE.TXT?rev=1.2view=markup
ddd
This is not a 3-clause BSD license, but rather an
MJ Ray wrote:
The English licence seems more established than the Scottish one
and contains the problems from the US one, as far as I can tell.
I've not seen an RFC from the English drafters, though.
The English one also contains the unacceptable clause 7 trademark terms,
which is a translation
It has been pointed out to me and Raul privately that participation
from others in the GPL-related threads has petered out. Has everyone
basically made up their minds at this point, leaving little reason for
us to continue copying d-l? If so, perhaps he and I should continue
debating privately
14 matches
Mail list logo
