On 10298 March 1977, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
As some of you might know some time ago I created a web page for
listing information about licenses discussed by debian-legal
at http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/
Since this hasn't really worked out I propose to delete this stuff again
until
You best friends and family deserve the BEST internet photo album!
http://lgxt.0pmf3z0tfs0pf10.gastmjgast6.com
War is a series of catastrophes that results in a victory.
Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would love that page working (ie new license summaries added). Would, for=
some
obscure license crap make my life easier if such a thing appears in
NEW. :)
But then it should be maintained, and I know that its impossible to get
something useful out
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 08:53:44PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
+ * Permission is hereby granted for the distribution of this firmware
data
+ * in hexadecimal or equivalent format, provided this copyright notice is
+ * accompanying it.
Just a
Penis Enlargement announcement
http://www.toonu.net/ss/
Vote early and vote often.
We teach them proper principles and let them govern themselves.
Whatever advice you give, be brief.
War is a series of catastrophes that results in a victory.
Girls are always running
On Tue, 24 May 2005 08:48:49 -0500 Bill Allombert wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 07:55:52PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Could we at least wait until post-Helsinki? There's a session on the
DFSG planned, and it would be helpful to gain a better idea of what
the not-on-legal part of the
On Tue, 24 May 2005 15:53:29 +0100 Matthew Garrett wrote:
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I disagree with that. Debian is an online organisation and
discussion and decision need to happen online. Noone is prevented to
read debian-legal.
People are heavily discouraged from
On Tue, 24 May 2005 02:33:02 +0100 MJ Ray wrote:
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Shortly after creation this stalled however as nobody created
summaries anymore, probably because for many discussions it proved
to be difficult if not imopossible to summarise many of the
discussions without
On Mon, 23 May 2005 19:20:42 -0400 Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Frank Lichtenfeld wrote:
Since this hasn't really worked out I propose to delete this stuff
again until someone comes up with a better idea how to better present
the work of debian-legal.
It would really, really, really help if
On 5/26/05, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 08:53:44PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
Would we actually be distributing the hexadecimal format, or would we
be distributing the packed binary[1] representation of the hexadecimal
format?
I guess that if there is a
Francesco Poli wrote:
I hope that we can find a better way to keep track of past debian-legal
discussions: otherwise we are at risk of forgetting the issues that were
discovered and/or deciding in inconsistent ways about similar clauses...
I've noted before that it sounds to me more like a
On 25 May 2005 10:24:32 GMT MJ Ray wrote:
There's too much noise, not enough signal, each
of you endlessly rebutting the other point-by-point.
I agree: I stopped following those very long and hard-to-read
discussions a while ago, so anything useful buried in them is lost to
me... :-(
--
On 5/26/05, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the initrd image, and more plainly the d-i .udebs are in question here.
Is the GPL in the .udeb (or elsewhere in d-i)? If so, the putative
license-on-bundled-bits.txt should go in as well.
Cheers,
- Michael
Michael K. Edwards wrote:
Is the GPL in the .udeb (or elsewhere in d-i)?
No.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, 26 May 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 08:53:44PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
+ * Permission is hereby granted for the distribution of this firmware
data
+ * in hexadecimal or equivalent format, provided this
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please try and avoid non-costructive criticism.
It's true that debian-legal often experiences what can be seen as
noise or interesting discussions, depending on your point of view,
mood, and temperature... but calling it masturbation is a bit rude,
Double Whammy http://www.get4fast.com/ Lynch
Jaywalk Hocus Pocus
The ability to quote is a serviceable substitute for wit. Off The Cuff
Growing old is mandatory; growing up is optional!!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 10:44:49AM +1000, John Skaller wrote:
Felix is a 'free for any use' open source advanced
License text [0]:
Licence
Copyright (C) 2004 John Skaller.
Felix is Free For Any Use.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
One stop store for best levitra buy.
http://rouym.o39hap6zlyoea76.wisnjwis7.com
Let every man be respected as an individual and no man idolized.
How much easier it is to be critical than to be correct.
CANONICALS, n. The motley worm by Jesters of the Court of Heaven.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
19 matches
Mail list logo
