Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> However, portaudio looks non-free to me.
>
> http://www.portaudio.com/license.html:
> * Any person wishing to distribute modifications to the Software is
> requested to send the modifications to the original developer so that
> they can be incorporated into the canonical ve
Hi Guys
I'm the dev lead for PortAudio.
Matt Brubeck wrote:
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Things like portaudio and MIDIshare never really arrived. (OK, I'm
exaggerating slightly - Doesn't Audacity use portaudio?)
Audacity does use portaudio. Portaudio isn't dead and gone, but
development is barely
Hi,
> > However, portaudio looks non-free to me.
>
> According to my reading of the license (and according to the PortAudio
> upstream authors), this clause is a non-binding request, and so it does
> not make the license non-free. Please see this thread:
>
>http://lists.debian.org/debian-le
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Things like portaudio and MIDIshare never really arrived. (OK, I'm
exaggerating slightly - Doesn't Audacity use portaudio?)
Audacity does use portaudio. Portaudio isn't dead and gone, but
development is barely progressing. With portaudio-v19 audacity can
use jack.
Audaci
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 16 February 2006 22:49, Junichi Uekawa was like:
Audio on the other hand seems to have mostly settled for ALSA and jack.
(I'm not sure if portaudio is gone?)
Things like portaudio and MIDIshare never really arrived. (OK, I'm
exaggerating slightly - Doesn't
Hi,
> > On Thursday 16 February 2006 22:49, Junichi Uekawa was like:
> Audio on the other hand seems to have mostly settled for ALSA and jack.
> (I'm not sure if portaudio is gone?)
> > Things like portaudio and MIDIshare never really arrived. (OK, I'm
> > exaggerating slightly - Doesn't
On 18 Feb 2006 12:43:51 -0500, Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Unfortunately, the dismissal is not yet final and many of the recent
> filings[1] are not (easily?) available online.
Re: Wither Wallace?
by: day5done10/12/05 11:03 am
GPL supporters such as Tuxrocks and
On 2/18/06, olive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the following links might interest you.
Yeah.
> All complain about the GPL are dismissed one after the other.
>
> http://hearsay.com/wp-hdcarchives/cases/wallace_v_fsf-28nov2005.pdf
Here the judge rejected a number of the arguments of the Fr
olive writes:
> I think the following links might interest you. All complain about the
> GPL are dismissed one after the other.
>
> http://hearsay.com/wp-hdcarchives/cases/wallace_v_fsf-28nov2005.pdf
> http://opensource.sys-con.com/read/168985.htm
Unfortunately, the dismissal is not yet final an
I think the following links might interest you. All complain about the
GPL are dismissed one after the other.
http://hearsay.com/wp-hdcarchives/cases/wallace_v_fsf-28nov2005.pdf
http://opensource.sys-con.com/read/168985.htm
Olive
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
10 matches
Mail list logo
