Re: Missing documentation for autoconf

2006-02-23 Thread olive
Anthony DeRobertis wrote: olive wrote: The social contract say also We will never make the system require the use of a non-free component. It is reasonable to think that the use of Debian requires the GFDL documentation. Even assuming the above it is reasonable is true[0], the following

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?

2006-02-23 Thread olive
Not any code can reuse any other code, but patch clauses mean code can't even be reused in code with the *same license*, prohibiting it entirely. I hope you're wrong and that code reuse is unimportant and can be prohibited wasn't really the rationale. I think (but I am not sure) that this

gnome-vfs daemon, GPL and LGPL

2006-02-23 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi list, I've noticed that the gnome-vfs2 source package includes some GPL source files. These are the sources of gnome-vfs-daemon. As I understand it, the daemon is not essential for the gnome-vfs functionality, but it is spawned when some operations are requested. To what level do you think

Pricing

2006-02-23 Thread stephen dorwin
Next SportsUnit # 3Pakistan.Tel: +92-432- 557253Fax: +92-432-250896[EMAIL PROTECTED]debian-legal@lists.debian.org Dear Adnan Malik,I'm highly interested in footbagging products, as I've wholesales business mostly based on big promotional compaigns, so ask you to send me complete FOB

Re: gnome-vfs daemon, GPL and LGPL

2006-02-23 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 12:00:46PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: I've noticed that the gnome-vfs2 source package includes some GPL source files. These are the sources of gnome-vfs-daemon. As I understand it, the daemon is not essential for the gnome-vfs functionality, but it is spawned when