Kevin B. McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would be interested to hear your opinions on the Geant4 Software
License, version 1.0 [1]. [...]
[1] http://geant4.web.cern.ch/geant4/license/LICENSE.html
I think it is clearly GPL-incompatible (as you noted) for reasons
similar to the old BSD licence and
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kevin B. McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would be interested to hear your opinions on the Geant4 Software
License, version 1.0 [1]. [...]
[1] http://geant4.web.cern.ch/geant4/license/LICENSE.html
I think it is clearly
Joe Smith writes:
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kevin B. McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would be interested to hear your opinions on the Geant4 Software
License, version 1.0 [1]. [...]
[1] http://geant4.web.cern.ch/geant4/license/LICENSE.html
I think
Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Jun 27, 2006, at 19:14, Robinson Tryon wrote:
Does anyone know where I could find the explicit license from
Adobe/Digital for these fonts?
IANAL, but:
I believe that as far as bitmaps go, Adobe believes it has no
case against the 1988 U.S. Copyright Office opinion[1]
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 12:44:35AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
12.1 Termination. This License and the rights granted hereunder
will terminate:
[...]
(c) automatically without notice if You, at any time during the
term of this License, commence an action for patent infringement
(including as
It's curious why sun thinks htye need FAR?DFAR clauses.
They have added similar language in the CDDL License.
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/cddl1.php
By the way; the OSI has approved the CDDL as being complaint with thier
guidelines, which I beleive are similar to DFSG, so inclusion of the
6 matches
Mail list logo
