Evan Prodromou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does the anti-DRM requirement in the CCPL 3.0 draft, without a
parallel distribution proviso, make it incompatible with the
DFSG?
It means that any work under any CC 3.0 does not follow the DFSG unless
the licensor grants additional
On Fri, 2006-11-08 at 09:34 +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
How does CC make decisions? They know how we make decisions and seem
to be hoping the debian project backs down when pushed to a general
resolution.
If they were going to play the heavy with us, why would they bother
making all the other
Hello Ben and *,
sorry for the late reponse, but I was in Palestine and
have gotten trouble with the Israelian Authority...
(They give bullschit on Diplomatic immunity!)
Am 2006-06-12 17:37:16, schrieb Ben Finney:
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since I am using Debian/main only
On Friday 11 August 2006 18:10 pm, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I believe that the totaly interchangable option of specifying
-static or not should not change the free-ness of the source or
resulting binary. So if you link static and you agree that it is a
violation that way then you should not
4 matches
Mail list logo
