On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:28:04AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
Sean Kellogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, you propose that Firefox refers to both the code base and the browser?
Not only that, but firefox (lowercase, not as in the trademark)
While I agree with the conclusion that there's no great
On Friday 08 December 2006 00:16, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:28:04AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
Sean Kellogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, you propose that Firefox refers to both the code base and the
browser?
Not only that, but firefox (lowercase, not as in the
Terry Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...] Just because it's fun to argue, though [...]
I think it's extremely unfunny to have off-topic angels-on-pinhead debates
looping away. If anything on-topic comes out of this subthread, please
summarise it in a new subthread.
Thanks,
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Eugene cannot use the name ChangedFont, because it's the name of
the work he's modifying
- neither can Eugene use the name MyFont, because it's the name of
the work ChangedFont is based on
- Eugene calls his font EnhancedFont
*
Hi all!
What follows is my own analysis of the first draft of GNU FDL v2.
I welcome any comments on my reasoning.
The full text of the draft is available at http://gplv3.fsf.org/
GNU Free Documentation License
Discussion Draft 1 of Version 2, 25 September 2006
THIS IS A DRAFT, NOT A
Hi all again!
What follows is my own analysis of the first draft of GNU SFDL v1.
I apologize for repeating some of the comments I've already written
regarding the GNU FDL v2 draft, but... blame the FSF for publishing
*two* license drafts with large chunks of identical text in common...
Once
Hi,
What is the status of the discussion with PEAR (or PHP Group) about
using the PHP license in some of the PEAR packages? [1][2]
I'm currently in need of QuickForm (v3) in a GNU GPL'd application,
but QuickForm is released under the PHP license, which is incompatible
:/
Thanks,
[1]
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 01:21:24AM +0100, Jacobo Tarrio wrote:
El martes, 5 de diciembre de 2006 a las 13:57:48 -0800, Jeff Carr escrib?a:
I notice that recently you have complied with Mozilla's request to not
use their trademarks for your browser packages. However, you can't
also use
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What follows is my own analysis of the first draft of GNU FDL v2.
I welcome any comments on my reasoning.
As you might expect from
my summary http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/2006/fdl#general
I agree with most of that reasoning, apart from:
[...] Both
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:05:52PM +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
Hi,
What is the status of the discussion with PEAR (or PHP Group) about
using the PHP license in some of the PEAR packages? [1][2]
I'm currently in need of QuickForm (v3) in a GNU GPL'd application,
but QuickForm is released
On 12/9/06, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:05:52PM +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
Hi,
If you are the author of said application, you could release under the
MIT or BSD-type license.
Couldn't GPL+exception be used? Or is the incompatibility both ways?
11 matches
Mail list logo
