Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MJ Ray wrote:
Please can someone explain to me how this use of the official logo
doesn't satisfy the licence? [...]
The current Official Use Logo license is quite unfree: it requires, in part:
This logo may only be used if:...
* official
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
The trademark holder hereby grants permission to any person to use the
trademark
(and derivative marks) in any way except one: you may not use it to falsely
represent something else as being the thing represented by the trademark.
This
permission should be
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:38:40 +0100 David Claughton wrote:
[...]
Anyway according to bug #308680 this package was removed because the
manual was at the time undistributable.
Yes, after reading the looong bug log, it seems so.
However according to the MySQL website the license for the
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:46:31 -0400 Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Yeargh. I'm sorry I wasn't paying attention in February and didn't
see that Wiki page.
Better late than never! ;-)
Look, we know what we want to do.
(1) License the *copyright* freely as usual.
(2) Restrict the *trademark*
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:06:39 +0200 Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
[...]
Your use of the trademark may not create a sense of endorsement,
sponsorship, or false association with the trademark holder.
Your use of the trademark may not diminish the distinctiveness
of the trademark or harm the
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:15:38 +0200 Lasse Reichstein Nielsen wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:46:06 +0200, Francesco Poli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, this is my attempt to rephrase clause 5d in a form that is weak
enough to be less harmful than clause 2c of GPLv2:
begin
6 matches
Mail list logo
