2007/3/28, Matthew Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue Mar 27 20:54, Jason Spiro wrote:
2007/3/27, Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote:
Maybe if debian-legal or I wrote the license (I have never written a
license before, but maybe I could
On Thu Apr 26 16:25, Jason Spiro wrote:
Copyright (C) year copyright holders
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining
a copy of this work (the Work) to use, modify, copy, publish,
distribute, publicly perform, and/or sublicense copies of the Work,
and/or to
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
The GPL as a work, however, is *not* free, since the license on that
work does not grant the requisite freedoms. Surely there's no
disagreement on this?
It is irrelevant, because of several reasons that have already been
pointed out in this
Hi Matthew,
2007/4/26, Matthew Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu Apr 26 16:25, Jason Spiro wrote:
Copyright (C) year copyright holders
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining
a copy of this work (the Work) to use, modify, copy, publish,
distribute,
4 matches
Mail list logo
