Re: Request licence review

2007-05-02 Thread Ben Finney
Andrew Sidwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd really like to adopt a new manual, but it's by someone we can't > contact, and it's under a custom licence: > > Redistribution of unaltered copies of this document is permitted without > restriction. Distribution of altered copies is permitted with

Re: Request licence review

2007-05-02 Thread Wesley J. Landaker
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 11:13:48 Andrew Sidwell wrote: > Redistribution of unaltered copies of this document is permitted without > restriction. Distribution of altered copies is permitted without > restriction as long as the alteration does not significantly alter the > content (For example, tra

GCC's manpage refers to sections that aren't in the manpage

2007-05-02 Thread Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso
I'm rather confused. The GCC maintainers put the manpage in non-free along with the rest of the GCC docs. The manpage says at the bottom that it's covered by the GFDL and mentions invariant sections that aren't in the manpage. Huh? What does this mean as far as the location of the manpage and the

Request licence review

2007-05-02 Thread Andrew Sidwell
Hi, I've recently taken over development of a game (Angband) and have contacting all previous contributors to place it under the GPL. The code relicencing is almost done, but we have a problem with documentation. I'd really like to adopt a new manual, but it's by someone we can't contact, and it

Re: Debian-approved creative/content license?

2007-05-02 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2007-04-28 01:02:01, schrieb Francesco Poli: > That is to say, IIUC, among project members only compressed videos are > distributed. Yes, since how do you want to transfer several 100 Mbytes or some GBytes? per day and $MEMBER? To work on it the Uncompressed Videos are not neccesary for testin