Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14/05/07, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 May 2007 14:53:11 -0500 Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso wrote:
> > > What's a good webmail to use then?
> >
> > The URLs I referenced suggest some alternative e-mail services, IIRC.
>
First off, we're not talking about free/non-free here; we're talking
about who controls the copyright of a glyph in a font. The
free/non-free nature of the glyph is dependent on how that work is
licensed, not the copyright status of the work.
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> But a de
On 5/14/07, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 5/14/07, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Considering the fact that the actual symbol is a white wheelchair on a
> >blue background, it's not clear that a black font would be a
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 5/14/07, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Considering the fact that the actual symbol is a white wheelchair on a
> >blue background, it's not clear that a black font would be a
^
> >derivative work of such
On 14/05/07, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007 14:53:11 -0500 Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso wrote:
> On 11/05/07, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > P.S.: I recommend you against the use of Google Gmail.
>
> What's a good webmail to use then?
The URLs I referenc
On Mon, 14 May 2007 14:53:11 -0500 Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso wrote:
> On 11/05/07, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > P.S.: I recommend you against the use of Google Gmail.
>
> What's a good webmail to use then?
The URLs I referenced suggest some alternative e-mail services, IIRC.
--
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 05:24:04PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am Montag, den 14.05.2007, 13:25 +0200 schrieb Thijs Kinkhorst:
> > I've reviewed the licence, and I'm afraid it's a bit more bothered than
> > that
> > of the ms core fonts for the web: "You may use the software only to view
>
On 11/05/07, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
P.S.: I recommend you against the use of Google Gmail.
What's a good webmail to use then?
- Jordi G. H.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Montag, den 14.05.2007, 13:25 +0200 schrieb Thijs Kinkhorst:
> I've reviewed the licence, and I'm afraid it's a bit more bothered than that
> of the ms core fonts for the web: "You may use the software only to view and
> print files created with Microsoft Office software. You may not use the
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:14:35AM +, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Hi Maintainer,
>
> i dont think the EPSG tables license is free, so the dataset cant go into
> Debian main. Its a "dont modify, non-commercial only" license and a simple
> conversion into a different format doesnt change the license
On 5/14/07, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Considering the fact that the actual symbol is a white wheelchair on a
blue background, it's not clear that a black font would be a
derivative work of such a design.
I didn't think simply changing colors removed the original copyright.
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 02:51:31AM -0400, Nathan Edges II wrote:
> [...]
> http://www.dinf.ne.jp/doc/japanese/resource/other/z00014/z0001406_e.html
> [...]
>
> If a font includes [the symbol of access wheelchair] as a character,
> can it be free?
The character itself isn't non-free, but rather th
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> The International Symbol of Access (the wheelchair symbol that's
> used all over the place), to the best of my knowledge, is unfree.
> Its conditions of use can be seen at
> http://www.dinf.ne.jp/doc/japanese/resource/other/z00014/z0001406_e.html
> It'
13 matches
Mail list logo
