On Tue, 2007-07-08 at 14:15 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Those documents cover the issues you're raising; there's nothing I've
> said in the above that isn't already addressed by the documents Evan
> pointed you to.
I've started a wiki page about the history of Debian and the FDL; it may
be useful
My apologies, there were some inaccuracies in my initial reply, and it
was more dismissive than it should have been.
"Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 06/08/07, Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml
> > h
"Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The position statement and the vote all conflate invariant sections
> with cover texts and dedications as if exactly the same arguments
> against invariant sections applied to a cover text like "a gnu
> manual". Why are three words enough to
On 06/08/07, Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-08 at 08:58 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> > Can I get an explanation of why Debian considers a GFDL manual with
> > cover texts non-free?
>
> http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml
> http://www.d
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> dererk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I need help about a software that's license under MIRACL license.
>
> Here is the current text of the license at that URL:
General notes:
No grant of freedom to redistribute. Fails DFSG§1 and makes the work
by defau
dererk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I need help about a software that's license under MIRACL license.
> http://www.shamus.ie/index.php?page=Downloads
When asking for a discussion of a license text, please post the full
text here so the discussion and license text are both found together
in the l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello there!
I need help about a software that's license under MIRACL license [1].
I'm talking with it's developer, but he seems not to be interested in
changing it[2].
I think it can't be even used in non-free branches :-(
Thanks in advance,
D
On Mon, 2007-06-08 at 08:58 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> Can I get an explanation of why Debian considers a GFDL manual with
> cover texts non-free?
http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml
http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001
http://www.google.com/search?q=GFDL+D
Shriramana Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Did I miss the thread or has there not been any official announcement
> of the position of the Debian Project about the DFSG-freeness of the
> GPL 3 and LGPL 3? How about the AGPL? Seems to me that GPL 3 being
> DFSG free is a very important thing re
Can I get an explanation of why Debian considers a GFDL manual with
cover texts non-free?
For fuck's sakes... what's the big deal with a couple of unmodifiable sentences?
- Jordi G. H.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
10 matches
Mail list logo
