On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 02:20:46PM +0200, Nicolas Limare wrote:
Terms and conditions for using, copying, distribution and
modification of FooBar versions 2.x and 3.x.
You acknowledge to be informed about the following facts, and
you accept the consequences:
[...]
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it a kind of algorithm copyright?
No.
In some countries there is. They call it a patent.
IANAL etc
Neither am I.
--
Måns Rullgård
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 09:16:55AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it a kind of algorithm copyright?
No.
In some countries there is. They call it a patent.
A patent is not a copyright.
--
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Jyväskylä, Finland
Patents are totally separate from Copyrights. For a patent, you need to show
that the item being patented is new, useful, and non-obvious. You also would
have a patent registration number on file with a nation's patent office.
Copyrights don't have the same requirements and therefore you can
Hi,
I'm considering packaging ht2html [1] for Debian, mainly because the
Jython package I'm working on uses it to build its documentation.
The ht2html tarball doesn't include any license text file and no
copyright notice is found in source files.
But according to the SourceForge project
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 04:38:10 am Ryan R. Matt wrote:
Patents are totally separate from Copyrights. For a patent, you
need to show that the item being patented is new, useful, and
non-obvious. You also would have a patent registration number on
file with a nation's patent office.
Please don't top-post.
Ryan R. Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Patents are totally separate from Copyrights. [...]
Yes.
Copyrights don't have the same requirements and therefore you can
copyright a software algorithm.
No. Copyright applies only to a *specific, copyable expression* of an
7 matches
Mail list logo
