Ben Finney wrote:
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Even if the claim
of my monkey wrote it were true, there is no argument given to
conclude any particular legal status; merely an assertion that no
copyright should apply.
That's true. I am not at all convinced his monkey
Arnoud Engelfriet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ben Finney wrote:
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Even if the
claim of my monkey wrote it were true, there is no argument
given to conclude any particular legal status; merely an assertion
that no copyright should apply.
* Jacobo Tarrio [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080811 15:20]:
While these claims seem somewhat far-fetched, the end result is still
that the author has asserted the work is public domain. Why not
accept that?
Because that is not possible in Germany, where (I believe) the author lives.
I think it is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Okay,
what about this plan:
* strip the revoco part and put the rest of btnx into main
* create a second package - btnx-nonfree - including the revoco code -
and put it into non-free
* put conflicts/breaks against each other into the control files,
Philipp Hübner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* create a second package - btnx-nonfree - including the revoco code
- and put it into non-free
Once again, to distribute from non-free there needs to be a clear
license to redistribute. Without license to redistribute, the Debian
project can't
5 matches
Mail list logo
