-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Millan wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 10:27:19PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
License and copyright are one and the same.
GPL license relies on copyright law, just like almost any other open
source license there is, be it BSD, Artistic or
2009/4/14 Michael Crawford mdcrawf...@gmail.com:
There are actually four licenses to consider. Each is different from
the others in significant ways; it would be a terrible mistake to
choose any of them without fully understanding the consequences of
one's choice:
GPL2 only
GPL2 or any
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 08:41:08AM +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
Maybe taking derived code (e.g. including new code), one could write only
the license of aggregate work (thus one later license),
I think so. I agree it could be better to list them explicitly, but
upstream doesn't want that.
Stéphane Glondu st...@glondu.net wrote:
So one could even
make a proprietary compiler using C as an intermediate langage, and GCC
for the final stage, I guess.
Comeau C++'s GNU/Linux builds do exactly that. (In general it uses the local
C compiler as a slightly higher level assembler. This
4 matches
Mail list logo
