Hi,
I've ITPed IPAfont as otf-ipafont package.
Its license, IPA Font License is OSI approved, but it doesn't mean
equal to DFSG-Free. So, I'd like to ask you it is DFSG-Free or not.
It is TeX-like license and has some restriction for use its name for
derivatives and how to deal with
On Sat, 30 May 2009 14:34:26 +0200 Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
* Matthew Johnson mj...@debian.org [2009-05-30 08:17]:
The problem here is that either there is no copyright licence (in which
case we can't distribute it, even in non-free), or the blanket GPLv3
applies (which is, I think,
On Sat, 30 May 2009 12:36:21 +0200 (CEST) ha...@volny.cz wrote:
[...]
2) It is clear that GPL aims to allow for freedom
in manipulation with software. I don't think it
implies that should the only source become unavailable
due to higher circumstances (authors death),
it must stop being
On Fri, 29 May 2009 17:40:05 -0500 Gunnar Wolf wrote:
brian m. carlson dijo [Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:34:36PM +]:
Permission is hereby granted to use, copy, modify, and distribute this
software (or portions thereof) for any purpose, without fee, subject
to these
conditions:
Le dimanche 31 mai 2009 à 20:52 +0900, Hideki Yamane a écrit :
I've ITPed IPAfont as otf-ipafont package.
You can see its license at http://www.opensource.org/licenses/ipafont.html
Please give me your feedback (Please add CC to me). Thanks.
The only things that looks suspicious are the
2009/5/31 Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org:
Le dimanche 31 mai 2009 à 20:52 +0900, Hideki Yamane a écrit :
I've ITPed IPAfont as otf-ipafont package.
You can see its license at http://www.opensource.org/licenses/ipafont.html
Please give me your feedback (Please add CC to me). Thanks.
The
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:42:46PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Wed, 27 May 2009 11:37:56 +0200 Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:33:52AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Disclaimers, of course: IANADD, TINASOTODP (and IANAL, TINLA).
If you really feel the urge to add
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:05:56PM +1000, Peter Dolding wrote:
This is going to cause upset I know pushing all the .net applications
out of mainline.My problem here is legal status. Debian has to
protect all its uses commercial and non commercial a like. Mono is
going to have to be
8 matches
Mail list logo