* MJ Ray:
> cate wrote:
>> Eugen Dedu wrote:
>> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532456, about licenses
>> I think there is a problem in terminology. AFAIK (but IANAL), the
>> "any use" doesn't include distribution of software.
>> For this reason I think it is safe to classify it
cate wrote:
> Eugen Dedu wrote:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532456, about licenses
> I think there is a problem in terminology. AFAIK (but IANAL), the
> "any use" doesn't include distribution of software.
> For this reason I think it is safe to classify it as non distributa
"Giacomo A. Catenazzi" writes:
> -
> Copyright 1992, 1993, 1994 by Jutta Degener and Carsten Bormann,
> Technische Universitaet Berlin
>
> Any use of this software is permitted provided that this notice is not
> removed and that neither the authors nor the Technische Universitaet Berlin
> are
Eugen Dedu wrote:
Hi,
We have a bug report,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532456, about licenses
of various plugins of opal package, and I do not know if the licenses
involved are DFSG-free. Could you please tell me if these plugins are
allowed to be in debian main?
The mai
Hi,
We have a bug report,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532456, about licenses
of various plugins of opal package, and I do not know if the licenses
involved are DFSG-free. Could you please tell me if these plugins are
allowed to be in debian main?
Thank you,
--
Eugen Dedu
5 matches
Mail list logo