Re: Are these licenses DFSG?

2009-09-29 Thread Florian Weimer
* MJ Ray: > cate wrote: >> Eugen Dedu wrote: >> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532456, about licenses >> I think there is a problem in terminology. AFAIK (but IANAL), the >> "any use" doesn't include distribution of software. >> For this reason I think it is safe to classify it

Re: Are these licenses DFSG?

2009-09-29 Thread MJ Ray
cate wrote: > Eugen Dedu wrote: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532456, about licenses > I think there is a problem in terminology. AFAIK (but IANAL), the > "any use" doesn't include distribution of software. > For this reason I think it is safe to classify it as non distributa

Re: Are these licenses DFSG?

2009-09-29 Thread Ben Finney
"Giacomo A. Catenazzi" writes: > - > Copyright 1992, 1993, 1994 by Jutta Degener and Carsten Bormann, > Technische Universitaet Berlin > > Any use of this software is permitted provided that this notice is not > removed and that neither the authors nor the Technische Universitaet Berlin > are

Re: Are these licenses DFSG?

2009-09-29 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Eugen Dedu wrote: Hi, We have a bug report, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532456, about licenses of various plugins of opal package, and I do not know if the licenses involved are DFSG-free. Could you please tell me if these plugins are allowed to be in debian main? The mai

Are these licenses DFSG?

2009-09-29 Thread Eugen Dedu
Hi, We have a bug report, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532456, about licenses of various plugins of opal package, and I do not know if the licenses involved are DFSG-free. Could you please tell me if these plugins are allowed to be in debian main? Thank you, -- Eugen Dedu