Re: XNAT license terms... any chance for main?

2011-06-03 Thread PJ Weisberg
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Ken Arromdee wrote: > On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: >> >>   4. The software has been designed for research purposes only and has not >>   been approved for clinical use. It has not been reviewed or approved by >> the >>   Food and Drug Administration

Retirement News Weekly Yorkton: Issue Seventeen

2011-06-03 Thread RNW Yorkton
Retirement News Weekly Yorkton: Issue Seventeen ISSUE #18: June 3, 2011Last Month’s Readers: 18,557. This Month’s Readers: 3, 904! FROM RETIREE TO EMPLOYEE Your Retirement By: Brandee Musiala Does a silver ceiling exist? An increasing amount of retirees are deciding to return to work

Re: XNAT license terms... any chance for main?

2011-06-03 Thread Ken Arromdee
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: 4. The software has been designed for research purposes only and has not been approved for clinical use. It has not been reviewed or approved by the Food and Drug Administration or by any other agency. You acknowledge and agree that clini

Re: XNAT license terms... any chance for main?

2011-06-03 Thread Walter Landry
Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > 6. We request that you acknowledge the support of XNAT in publications > that utilize the software such as by "This product includes XNAT, > developed by > Randy Buckner at Harvard University and the Neuroinformatics Research > Group at > Washington U

XNAT license terms... any chance for main?

2011-06-03 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Hi Comrades, We are considering packaging XNAT [1]. Its license terms [2] look like an apache 1.1 like license with additional disclaimers (not for clinical use), and requests. Could you please advise either those of particular concern forbidding XNAT entering main? Here is the full list of ter