On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 07:57:39PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> I am not convinced: if someone releases a work under the GPL without
> making the corresponding source available, nobody else really has the
> true permission to redistribute, as the license requires
> re-distributors to make source
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 19:58:59 -0500 Guilherme de Siqueira Pastore wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 10:38:34PM +0200, Mark Weyer wrote:
[...]
> > but anybody else breaches the GPL 2 or 3 by not offering source code.
>
> ... but I tend to disagree at this point. Despite the possibility of
> consider
Le 16/04/12 18:09, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
> In response to: bugs.debian.org/669016
> Software homepage mentioned below: http://gyoto.obspm.fr/
>
> Le 16/04/12 17:38, Etienne Millon a écrit :
>>
>>> We also request that Gyoto modifications, extensions or plug-ins
>>> leading to a scientific publ
In response to: bugs.debian.org/669016
Software homepage mentioned below: http://gyoto.obspm.fr/
Le 16/04/12 17:38, Etienne Millon a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I just had a quick look at the website :
>
>> We also request that Gyoto modifications, extensions or plug-ins
>> leading to a scientific pub
Hi,
first of all, I'd like to point out that this topic is NOT a wesnoth
specific one. I have tried to bring up the point several times in the
past (even years ago), it was always sorta ignored, even though people
said that "yeah, surely the flattened images/music scores aren't source
nor pre
5 matches
Mail list logo
