Hiroki Horiuchi from Japan
After reading your words, now I think The Free Software Definition is
really permissive, but this very *permissiveness* made GNU's definition
insufficient for Debian Project.
Am I right?
I don't think so. The DFSG dates from 1997. The Free Software
Definition
https://lwn.net/Articles/501621/
http://www.ifosslr.org/ifosslr/issue/view/6
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
MJ Ray m...@phonecoop.coop writes:
Think of them as two parallel developments for similar concepts -
one is a definition, the other is a set of guidelines to follow.
Like http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq#four_freedoms says:
[the FSF's four freedoms] are the Free Software
3 matches
Mail list logo