On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 6:14 AM, chrysn wrote:
> as paul wise pointed out in march[1], some programs include "flattr
> this" or paypal donation buttons.
Thanks for your interest in this issue.
> 4. replace the image with text. probably the most viable way. has the
>same implications as 3., bu
Control: tags -1 wontfix
On 11/04/2012 03:23 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I hereby grant you a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free license to eat
> cheese with salami, subject to the following conditions:
>
> - You do not use the name of debian-legal while talking with food in your
>mouth.
hello debian-legal,
as paul wise pointed out in march[1], some programs include "flattr
this" or paypal donation buttons.
i found that thread looking up what to do with my openscad package,
which since recently includes a "flattr this" image. as i see it, my
options as a packager are:
1. keep th
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 02:56:27PM -0600, Michael Shuler wrote:
> Among other suggestions, Francesco Poli recommended including a verbatim
> copy of this license.
You should not. If the license has no legal force, you should not propagate
it and give people the impression that it does.
> > The C
On 11/03/2012 08:15 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 03:28:08PM -0500, Michael Shuler wrote:
>> After reading the -legal thread, comments above, the CAcert mailing list
>> thread, the Fedora explanation, and carefully reading the licensing
>> myself, the cautious side of me says
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 20:31:57 +0100 Michael Banck wrote:
[...]
> After thinking about this some more, I guess their fear might be that
> people modify and redistribute their ELPA library as part of a bigger
> GPL project.
It's possible...
> As the LGPL->GPL relicensing seems to be a one-way street
6 matches
Mail list logo
