Re: Creative Commons 4.0 licenses published

2013-11-28 Thread Mike Linksvayer
frob.nl> writes: > On 28.11.2013 13:27, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Le Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:03:31PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : > >> On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Paul Wise wrote: > >> > Mike Linksvayer suggests upgrading to CC0 instead: > >> This is not a good idea: CC0 is up for a rework too, they

Re: Creative Commons 4.0 licenses published

2013-11-28 Thread kuno
On 28.11.2013 13:27, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:03:31PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Paul Wise wrote: > Mike Linksvayer suggests upgrading to CC0 instead: This is not a good idea: CC0 is up for a rework too, they just decided to get CC 4.0 out of

Re: Creative Commons 4.0 licenses published

2013-11-28 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:03:31PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : > On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Paul Wise wrote: > > > Mike Linksvayer suggests upgrading to CC0 instead: > > This is not a good idea: CC0 is up for a rework too, they > just decided to get CC 4.0 out of the door first, and the > current

Re: Creative Commons 4.0 licenses published

2013-11-28 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Paul Wise wrote: > Mike Linksvayer suggests upgrading to CC0 instead: This is not a good idea: CC0 is up for a rework too, they just decided to get CC 4.0 out of the door first, and the current CC0 version is *explicitly* discouraged for use with software. (Also, Public Domai