Ian Jackson writes ("Re: trademark vs. renamed derivates"):
> So what Steve means is that you can just say:
>
> This package Y is based on the program X from company Z, but
> has been modified by Debian and others.
But, it occurs to me to ask:
What is this program ? It may be that renaming
Steve Langasek writes ("Re: trademark vs. renamed derivates"):
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 05:24:28PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > is there any example language for something like the following
> > around already, which I could reuse?
>
> > “This software Y is based on the software X, which was
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 05:24:28PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> is there any example language for something like the following
> around already, which I could reuse?
> “This software Y is based on the software X, which was written
> by the company Z; both X and Z are trademarks,
Hi everyone,
is there any example language for something like the following
around already, which I could reuse?
“This software Y is based on the software X, which was written
by the company Z; both X and Z are trademarks, but Y is not,
nor do we intend to use these trademarks (which is why we re
4 matches
Mail list logo
