Re: [PECL-DEV] Re: Re: [PHP-QA] Debian and the PHP license

2014-07-31 Thread Riley Baird
On 31/07/14 10:54, Walter Landry wrote: Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote: Would you change the licence to something more usual, like MIT/X style? No, this is completely infeasible That is not correct. It is very easy to change the license because the license has an upgrade

Re: [PECL-DEV] Re: Re: [PHP-QA] Debian and the PHP license

2014-07-31 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Ángel González dixit: On 30/07/14 22:00, Stas Malyshev wrote: You could not distribute other derived products bearing the name of PHP - but distributing PHP itself is fine, since it's not a product derived from PHP but the actual PHP. If Debian OTOH decides to make their own The actual PHP

Re: [PECL-DEV] Re: Re: [PHP-QA] Debian and the PHP license

2014-07-31 Thread Ángel González
Thorsten Glaser wrote: Ángel González dixit: On 30/07/14 22:00, Stas Malyshev wrote: You could not distribute other derived products bearing the name of PHP - but distributing PHP itself is fine, since it's not a product derived from PHP but the actual PHP. If Debian OTOH decides to make

Re: [PECL-DEV] Re: Re: [PHP-QA] Debian and the PHP license

2014-07-31 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Ángel González dixit: Please remember that we are just talking about changes that Debian itself may want to perform (so it doesn't require a renaming which would be bad both for PHP and Debian users). Right, but Debian probably (though it’s up to Ondřej Surý, the maintainer; there is no