On 01/03/15 00:05, Riley Baird wrote:
Or they could keep the files from Nokia under LGPL2.1, and use
GPL3+openssl exception for the rest of the files. Given that they have
proper headers, I don't see a problem with that, although I would
mention that in the readme.
But what license would the wor
> Or they could keep the files from Nokia under LGPL2.1, and use
> GPL3+openssl exception for the rest of the files. Given that they have
> proper headers, I don't see a problem with that, although I would
> mention that in the readme.
But what license would the work as a whole be distributed a
On 28/02/15 02:31, Riley Baird wrote:
Hi -legal!
I was reviewing a package "classified-ads" for Debian, and I noticed a
potential problem in the process. Namely, the author of the program has decided to use
GPL3 with the OpenSSL exception. However, they have taken some files from Nokia which a
3 matches
Mail list logo
