Riley Baird wrote [apparently not citing authors]:
>> DFSG-free software usually refrain from restricting use or download.
>
> Is this a requirement? The Microsoft Public License states:
>
> If you use the software, you accept this license. If you do not
> accept the license, do not use the
Jochen Sprickerhof writes ("CISST licence and DFSG"):
> as part of packaging ROS [1] for Debian, I've found a file [2] under the
> CISST licence [3]. Can someone comment on the DFSG compatibility of it?
IMO this licence is DFSG-free. I disagree with Ben Finney and
Francesco Poli.
(It's not a
2 matches
Mail list logo
