Dave Hibberd writes:
> https://naif.jpl.nasa.gov/naif/rules.html
>
> See especially sections on Kernels Distribution and Kernels
> Redistribution. The intent is to allow anyone to use or redistribute
> as long as the files/kernels are not modified."
This is incomplete. The full paragraph is:
| R
Ben Finney writes:
> I think it is non-free, for the reason above.
>
> If the license conditions also do not permit redistribution of modified
> works, the work is not DFSG-free. It cannot be in Debian.
I still think that the DE405 database is not a creative work and
therefore not copyrightable;
On 02/27/2018 10:39 PM, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Where can I find the text of the NOSA v2.0 ?
I was going to suggest
https://web.archive.org/web/20150923151504/https://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2013-June/000610.html
but the attachment containing the text was scrubbed.
NASA
On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:22:48 + jonathon wrote:
> On 02/27/2018 09:54 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> > That conflict needs to be resolved, IMO. Do they intend to grant all the
> > DFSG freedoms to the work's recipient, or not?
>
> My recommendation is to go back to NASA, asking if this will be
> reli
Ben Finney writes:
> Dave Hibberd writes:
>
>> […]
>> See especially sections on Kernels Distribution and Kernels
>> Redistribution. The intent is to allow anyone to use or redistribute
>> as long as the files/kernels are not modified."
>
> That intent explicitly does not permit distribution of m
On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:49:20 +1100 Ben Finney wrote:
> Ben Finney writes:
>
> > To the extent that text is derived from the GNU LGPL, it is a copyright
> > violation:
[...]
> I showed both of those to show that the requirement has not changed
> between versions (so it is sufficient to determine
On 02/27/2018 09:54 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> That conflict needs to be resolved, IMO. Do they intend to grant all the
> DFSG freedoms to the work's recipient, or not?
My recommendation is to go back to NASA, asking if this will be
relicenced under NOSO 2.0, if/when OSI states that that license is O
Dave Hibberd writes:
> […]
> See especially sections on Kernels Distribution and Kernels
> Redistribution. The intent is to allow anyone to use or redistribute
> as long as the files/kernels are not modified."
That intent explicitly does not permit distribution of modified works.
That permission
Hi Dave,
The FTP masters are the final judge, but it looks fine to me. It is
basically free distribution with a requirement to change attributions if
modified.
Cheers,
Walter Landry
Dave Hibberd writes:
> Walter,
>
> Thanks for the response - I got in touch with Mr Folkner, and I received the
Walter,
Thanks for the response - I got in touch with Mr Folkner, and I received the
following response:
"We consider the ascii and binary ephemeris files the same SPICE kernels that
have exactly the same information just in a different format. The ephemeris
data are then released for public u
10 matches
Mail list logo
