On Mon, 2022-06-27 at 08:32 -0600, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Major factors in making that decision include what data is actually
> available to the upstream author as well as how upstream has generally
> chosen to make modifications.
> If data is available to upstream but not to Debian that's a good
On Mon, 2022-06-27 at 07:27 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> No, that is not how it works. It is not only nice to have.
> We want the "preferred form of modification" in the package and a
> binary
> blob is often not.
>
> > For example, a program might contain a picture, but not the project
> > files
On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 at 13:23:41 +0100, Sebastian Crane wrote:
> What would you say the preferred form of modification should be for
> chess opening books?
I think talking about "the" preferred form for modification is often an
oversimplification when discussing content that is not executable
> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Crane writes:
Sebastian> Dear Tobias,
>> No, that is not how it works. It is not only nice to have. We
>> want the "preferred form of modification" in the package and a
>> binary blob is often not.
Sebastian> What would you say the preferred
Dear Tobias,
> No, that is not how it works. It is not only nice to have.
> We want the "preferred form of modification" in the package and a binary
> blob is often not.
What would you say the preferred form of modification should be for
chess opening books?
a: the collection of millions of
5 matches
Mail list logo
