Hi!
* Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080414 18:04]:
> > I asked around on the Teeworlds IRC channel, they pointed me to the
> > following thread on thier forums:
> > http://www.teeworlds.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=957
> >
> > The second post, by user matricks (matricks = copyright holder) cl
Hi!
Am 14.4.2008 schrieb "Miriam Ruiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>4. Neither this software nor any of its individual components, in original
> or modified versions, may be sold by itself.
Uhm... Please reconsider if that's a DFSG-free license ;)
Yours sincerely,
Alexander
Hi!
* David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080224 13:04]:
> I believe that the copyright notice should carry the real name of the author,
> shouldn't it?
Uhm... to best of my knowledge: No. Think at the dissident test.
Yours sincerely,
Alexander
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi!
* Michael Below <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070223 11:46]:
> That's an issue I tried to address here some time ago. I think the way
> to go is a new section of the distribution, comparable to non-US, maybe
> called adult. As it is now, I would not advise distributing Debian with
> these packages in
Hi!
* Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060718 16:31]:
> So if one does a custom dvd release of debian one must include source
> or make and keep it available for 3 years. By that reasoning anyone
> distributing only binary images is in breach of the GPL.
FWIW: That's what we do, when c
Hi!
* Radu-Cristian FOTESCU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060717 23:27]:
> Because I suppose that if I made up my own "modified Debian" and I'm
> sticking it to a magazine and label it "Debian Sarge, enhanced", I could
> be sued for that. I SHOULD BE SUED FOR THAT.
If we promise to sue you, if you do suc
Hi again!
* Radu-Cristian FOTESCU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060717 18:51]:
> > That is still false. People's erroneous beliefs do not entitle them
> > to anything.
> This is not about entitlement. This is about Debian's failure to react to a
> misuse of its trademarks.
Please, it is not a misuse of ou
Hi!
* Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060716 12:20]:
> > I am wondering about the implications of a *heavily modified*
> > version of Sarge, released by the German Linux Magazine:
> I think the best way to handle this is if local DDs check the issue and
> speak with them - as I'm local, I'll p
Hi!
* George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060701 15:20]:
> I hope that Alexander Schmehl is still willing to check it out and upload.
> Should anything still to be corrented I'm willing to do so. The new RC4
> implementation is documented in debian/copyright, along with th
Hi!
* José Carlos do Nascimento Medeiros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060202 12:49]:
> Hi, Im mantainer of two packages in Debian, and they have problems with
> php license 2.0.
>
> php group released new version of php license, solving problems with
> Debian.
> Is these version compatible with Debian
Hi!
* Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050702 17:00]:
> > The Wolfenstein case has the additional problem that the game contains
> > lots of swastikas and other nazi symbols, which are banned in
> > Germany. Using these banned symbols (outside of history education) is
> > what the cited No. 2 o
* Jan Minar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041220 04:28]:
> > Citing Debian Free Software Guidelines [1]:
> > =
> > 4. Integrity of The Author's Source Code
> > [..] The license may require derived works to carry a different name or
> > version number from the original software. [..]
> > =
> The dif
Hi!
* Jan Minar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041219 20:04]:
> AFAICT, the only non-free section is:
>
> http://www.xdebug.org/license.php";>
> 4. Products derived from this software may not be called "Xdebug", nor
> may "Xdebug" appear in their name, without prior written permission from
> [EMAIL PROTEC
13 matches
Mail list logo
