in general speak to each
other in the manner Henning addressed me.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Human beings rarely imagine a god
Debian GNU/Linux | that behaves any better than a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | spoiled child.
http://people.debian.org
BS.
Until you can settle down I'm not going to discuss this with you.
--
G. Branden Robinson|Optimists believe we live in the
Debian GNU/Linux |best of all possible worlds.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Pessimists are afraid the optimists
http
the European Union, want to oppose it?
--
G. Branden Robinson| The National Security Agency is
Debian GNU/Linux | working on the Fourth Amendment
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | thing.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Phil Lago, Deputy XD, CIA
of corporations. We'd all be better off if copyright law
worldwide were vastly reformed to reflect common sense and human rights
rather than a welfare system for corporations and the heirs of dead
artists.
--
G. Branden Robinson|If a man ate a pound of pasta and a
Debian GNU/Linux
educated that it isn't just the United States that passes bad laws.
[1] the same sort of unilaterialist hubris that George W. Bush is
rightfully accused of
--
G. Branden Robinson|To Republicans, limited government
Debian GNU/Linux |means not assisting
laissez-faire about U.S. capitalism is that rich
individuals and corporations are free to shoot you in the back of the
head and then send your next-of-kin an invoice for the labor and
material costs incurred in carrying out your execution.
--
G. Branden Robinson|Somewhere
are quite wrong. A translated work is a product of both
the original author and the translator, and both have an independent
copyright.
Several people have explained this to Javier. He seems unwilling to
look through Galileo's telescope on the point.
--
G. Branden Robinson
in OpenBSD. Contrary to what people might think, not only can I
chance the license of version X, I can change the license of version X
minus 1, X minus 2, X minus 3...
Any license that is revocable at will in this manner is not DFSG-free,
even if would otherwise be.
--
G. Branden Robinson
are
different parties, we cannot make such an assumption at all. Copyright
holder A cannot, in general, make guarantees on behalf of patent holder
B that the copyrighted work is non-infringing on the patent.
--
G. Branden Robinson| The only way to get rid of a
Debian GNU/Linux
that the
document or any translation of it could possibly be allowed in main.
The non-freeness of the original document would prevent any translation
from being DFSG-free, as I understand U.S. copyright law.
--
G. Branden Robinson|People are equally horrified at
Debian GNU/Linux
not be
enforcable anywhere to the degree that the unilateral change adds new
demands of the user.
Debian generally respects even unenforceable licenses.
--
G. Branden Robinson| No math genius, eh? Then perhaps
Debian GNU/Linux | you could explain to me where you
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:03:31PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 01:02:20PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 12:36:28PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
wrote:
May I remark the phrase The copyright in such work
, thats perfectly legiimate.
Difference does not apply exclusiveness. Or haven't you ever seen a
work with multiple copyright notices?
--
G. Branden Robinson|Any man who does not realize that
Debian GNU/Linux |he is half an animal is only half a
[EMAIL
agreement?
--
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux |Yeah, that's what Jesus would do.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Jesus would bomb Afghanistan. Yeah.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgphAhOwXPoLc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
] Yes, it's a minor point, but poor grammar degrades clarity. One
wants clarity in legal language even more than in regular conversation.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Good judgement comes from
Debian GNU/Linux | experience; experience comes from
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 01:30:48PM -0800, James Michael DuPont wrote:
The reason why I am re-doing the port of these tools to windows is the
lack of the source codes and the general disrespect of the section3 of
the GPL in the windows community.
I'm shocked -- shocked, I say!
--
G. Branden
delusion
and FUD, the GPL does not supersede the licensing on any work (unless
the person who holds the copyright on a work says so).
--
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux | Music is the brandy of the damned.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- George
feet, which violates DFSG 7.
--
G. Branden Robinson| We either learn from history or,
Debian GNU/Linux | uh, well, something bad will
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | happen.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Bob Church
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 08:20:56PM +, Sander Vesik wrote:
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 06:34:14PM +0100, Sander Vesik wrote:
Speaking as the upstream - it would also be definately much better if
everyone used just the same one tarball
intellectual property right.
--
G. Branden Robinson| There's nothing an agnostic can't
Debian GNU/Linux | do if he doesn't know whether he
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | believes in it or not.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Graham Chapman
.
If need be, I can host the removed packages from my public_html
directory on people.debian.org, which is a U.S. host. Of course, only
Debian users from the U.S., Canada, and other countries that respect the
principle of _Feist_ can use them.
--
G. Branden Robinson| I suspect Linus
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 09:10:32AM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Debian should not be shipping -- in source or binary form -- anything in
main that isn't DFSG-free, because unless we make a good-faith effort
to ensure that everyting in main is DFSG
with this offer,
not you.
I vote for allowing the package into Debian main as is.
It's just that it appears to me that there is not unanimous agreement on
that course of action.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Intellectual property is neither
Debian GNU/Linux
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:09:17PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I vote for allowing the package into Debian main as is.
Er, the package is already in Debian main, though the package
incorrectly states the license in LGPL.
Under the analysis of some
. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux | Ab abusu ad usum non valet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | consequentia.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgpcIC7jGppu2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
] native English speakers, *mentally* insert your favorite joke about
the law not being written in English here, so that you don't have to
contribute it to this discussion
--
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux | If encryption is outlawed, only
[EMAIL
,
though, I'm not sure about.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Never attribute to malice that
Debian GNU/Linux | which can be adequately explained
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | by stupidity.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgpIe9kJmXrpt.pgp
Description
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:40:37AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:47:55PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Is original completely meaningless?
No, I am merely saying that you have not proven your implied premise that
all wordlists are created by extraction from
empires. Asserting copyright in word
lists extracted from dictionaries, and other works that are the result
of the un-original application of processes, is a tactic that forfeits
strategies we'll need in the future. Let us not surrender battles we
have yet to fight.
--
G. Branden Robinson
to say that I hope that it is the case that these are
un-copyrightable, but as of yet your arguments based on law don't seem
convincing.
I don't think you are reading my argument very carefully.
--
G. Branden Robinson| There's nothing an agnostic can't
Debian GNU/Linux
? Something about harmonization and all that. :-P
http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2002/3mer/2mer/2001-0618.mer.aa.html
http://www.kryogenix.org/writings/tech/eucd
--
G. Branden Robinson| To be is to do -- Plato
Debian GNU/Linux | To do
outputting files, so that you
could run them through other programs is bad; someone, somewhere,
might actually use that data in a non-approved way. They might forget to
put a license on their perl script, say.
Huh?
--
G. Branden Robinson| You could wire up a dead rat to a
Debian
/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change
--
G. Branden Robinson| Good judgement comes from
Debian GNU/Linux | experience; experience comes from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | bad judgement.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Fred Brooks
, at least
in the United States.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/17/chapters/1/sections/section_106.html
--
G. Branden Robinson| You could wire up a dead rat to a
Debian GNU/Linux | DIMM socket and the PC BIOS memory
[EMAIL PROTECTED
than doing it fast.
If the Debian Project can help you to select or write a license that
meets your needs, please don't hesitate to contact us at:
debian-legal@lists.debian.org
--
G. Branden Robinson| To be is to do -- Plato
Debian GNU/Linux | To do
should get their money back from whatever lawyer
wrote this.
The package is not coherently licensed and should not be distributed by
Debian at all, even in non-free, until this problem is resolved.
--
G. Branden Robinson|You should try building some of the
Debian GNU/Linux
TLS's OpenSSL compatiblity layer provide sufficient
functionality for Courier to work with it? (apt-get install libgnutls5-dev)
--
G. Branden Robinson|If you wish to strive for peace of
Debian GNU/Linux |soul, then believe; if you wish to
[EMAIL PROTECTED
not exhaustively catalog every case.
--
G. Branden Robinson| It's not a matter of alienating
Debian GNU/Linux | authors. They have every right to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | license their software however we
http://people.debian.org/~branden
would He get around to less serious offenses like
disbelief. ;-)
--
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux |Yeah, that's what Jesus would do.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Jesus would bomb Afghanistan. Yeah.
http://people.debian.org/~branden
, please cc me the answers.
There have been a few revisions of the APSL. Please provide us with a
pointer to the one you're talking about.
--
G. Branden Robinson|A celibate clergy is an especially
Debian GNU/Linux |good idea, because it tends to
[EMAIL
is implicitly prohibited by the Constitution.
Other people believe that Section 4.1 of the Constitution already gives
the Developers this power.
The only reason two GRs were proposed is because each of the groups is
trying to pound some sense into the other.
--
G. Branden Robinson
-- or not -- even
in the source distribution.
--
G. Branden Robinson|The first thing the communists do
Debian GNU/Linux |when they take over a country is to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |outlaw cockfighting.
http://people.debian.org/~branden
.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Convictions are more dangerous
Debian GNU/Linux | enemies of truth than lies.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Friedrich Nietzsche
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgpK5S8xYFhJs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
of restrictions they can place in the license
on the back of that exception that we'll accept. They're wrong. The
patch clause is doing more harm than good.
--
G. Branden Robinson| The software said it required
Debian GNU/Linux | Windows 3.1
On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 08:28:30AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 12:35, Branden Robinson wrote:
Strictly speaking, our concerns are only whether a license is
legimitate, and whether it's DFSG-free.
Well, when we see stuff like the cdrdao license, which appears
the stick, e.g., waiving the must-distribute-source
requirement of the GPL.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Never underestimate the power of
Debian GNU/Linux | human stupidity.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Robert Heinlein
http://people.debian.org
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 06:48:31PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
In short (as I understand it), placing software under the GPL with
additional restrictions simply doesn't work.
It does, if you dual-license it. If you don't, then in general you've
got software without a license.
--
G. Branden
need to be moved
out of main.
--
G. Branden Robinson| I suspect Linus wrote that in a
Debian GNU/Linux | complicated way only to be able to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | have that comment in there.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Lars
a transferrable license,
you'll either have to remove the files or move the package to non-free.
Anyway, thanks in advance for your advice!
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.
--
G. Branden Robinson| You could wire up a dead rat to a
Debian GNU/Linux
, and about what.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Good judgement comes from
Debian GNU/Linux | experience; experience comes from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | bad judgement.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Fred Brooks
pgp0EhqkEPaq8.pgp
remarks
--
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux | De minimis non curat lex.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgp7rSvcb86L1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
, and delcares
this not a problem
:)
--
G. Branden Robinson|Religion is regarded by the common
Debian GNU/Linux |people as true, by the wise as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |false, and by the rulers as useful.
http://people.debian.org/~branden
code under the DFSG. You can do it under GPL, BSD,
or put the code under into public domain.
I concur with Santiago on this.
--
G. Branden Robinson| The National Security Agency is
Debian GNU/Linux | working on the Fourth Amendment
[EMAIL PROTECTED
so has it ever occured to you to use
logic?, then please go away.
Because that's just what you sound like.
If you want logic, establish your premises with the aid of 2 months'
worth of context.
If you just want to bitch, consider yourself heard. Now move along.
--
G. Branden Robinson
, move along, for your observations are off-topic.
--
G. Branden Robinson| No math genius, eh? Then perhaps
Debian GNU/Linux | you could explain to me where you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | got these... PENROSE TILES!
http://people.debian.org
software in that event.
--
G. Branden Robinson| If you have the slightest bit of
Debian GNU/Linux | intellectual integrity you cannot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | support the government.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- anonymous
.
Please see the Debian Mailing List disclaimer:
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/disclaimer
--
G. Branden Robinson|A committee is a life form with six
Debian GNU/Linux |or more legs and no brain.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |-- Robert Heinlein
http
apply it consistently; i.e., to all email addresses
2) we leave enough information for a person to be able to reconstruct
the address unambiguously
--
G. Branden Robinson|Somebody once asked me if I thought
Debian GNU/Linux |sex was dirty. I said
conditions sound familiar. :)
--
G. Branden Robinson| We either learn from history or,
Debian GNU/Linux | uh, well, something bad will
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | happen.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Bob Church
fulfill the
requirements of the GNU GPL, therefore they may not distribute the
Software at all.
Non-distributable means non-free. You should probably file a grave bug
against this package. Feel free to quote this mail.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Human beings rarely imagine
using a recipe. This recipe could
then be handed to the FTP admins.
Or perhaps the consensus of debian-legal is good enough for the FTP
team; it has been in the past.
I wonder what the delta between Tatu's ssh 1.2.12 and 1.2.26 is, and how
much of that affects mindterm.
--
G. Branden Robinson
OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT,
STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN
ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
--
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux | Bother, said Pooh
, perhaps Microsoft is a poor example...
--
G. Branden Robinson|Men use thought only to justify
Debian GNU/Linux |their wrong doings, and speech only
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |to conceal their thoughts.
http://people.debian.org/~branden
that they play for free.
/me grins, ducks, runs, and watches that one go over the heads of
everyone outside the U.S.
--
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux | Music is the brandy of the damned.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- George Bernard Shaw
http
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 04:43:20AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Any references? Google for 'zend Branden Robinson' can't find anything
other than the message I'm replying to.
Hmm, must have been IRC.
Zend appears to be distributed under different licenses.
http://www.zend.com/license
, when our genotypes are copyrighted and we are
prosecuted for carrying around billions of unlicensed copies, we'll wake
up and smell the bullshit that is intellectual property law.
--
G. Branden Robinson|If you wish to strive for peace of
Debian GNU/Linux
in one key using only the tonic, subdominant, and dominant
scale degrees. (There is a finite and small number of ways to juxtapose
three chords without repeating them.)
--
G. Branden Robinson| Reality is what refuses to go away
Debian GNU/Linux | when I
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 09:17:26AM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As U.S. law becomes increasingly hostile to free software development,
we may need to revisit that interpretation.
Maybe, but the choice of law stuff is only there for settling
, of course there are no First Amendment problems with the
DMCA; consumers retain their Fair Use rights in theory. If we make it
practically impossible for them to exercise them, it's not our problem.
--
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux | Extra territorium
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 02:27:39PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
On Sat, 2002-08-10 at 18:18, Branden Robinson wrote:
Is there, in fact, any other software that would need to be pulled
from main if DSFG 4 were eliminated and DFSG 3 rewritten as follows:
Just stumbled across one: The Q
of
software freedom; the DMCA, crypto regulations, and patents spring to
mind.
How would U.S. developers like it if a free software author in a country
that bans encryption entirely distributed a software product under a
DFSG-free license, but with a choice-of-law clause?
--
G. Branden Robinson
hostile to free software development,
we may need to revisit that interpretation.
--
G. Branden Robinson|If a man ate a pound of pasta and a
Debian GNU/Linux |pound of antipasto, would they
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |cancel out, leaving him
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 04:12:05PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
On Wed, 2002-08-07 at 13:04, Branden Robinson wrote:
Historically, this is regarded as a GPL-compatible license. The
GPL-incompatible BSD-style clause is the one that *forces* you to
publicize the name of the copyright
modifications in
any way.
?
--
G. Branden Robinson| No math genius, eh? Then perhaps
Debian GNU/Linux | you could explain to me where you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | got these... PENROSE TILES!
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Stephen R
is a technical mechanism for
making reference to an inteface, just as a filename is a technical
mechanism for identifying a set of bytes on a disk.
DFSG-free licenses do not compel functional incompatibility, or the
advertisement of same.
--
G. Branden Robinson| I came, I saw
can editorialize on how Debian has lost its way
from the true freedom that is represented by TeX.
In other words, it's the same, tired old my free is better than your
free noise that some BSD advocates have been spewing against the Free
Software Foundation for 15 years or more.
--
G. Branden
.
Police and courts protecting your markets good.
Guaranteed revenue streams good.
State-protected business models good.
Competition bad.
Invisible hand bad.
Product reviews bad.
Independent scientific research bad.
--
G. Branden Robinson|The best place to hide something
with them on
that point.
I hope this helps!
--
G. Branden Robinson|The first thing the communists do
Debian GNU/Linux |when they take over a country is to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |outlaw cockfighting.
http://people.debian.org/~branden
such action. As the
package maintainer I would think C. M. Connelly should be involved in
such an appointment procedure.
--
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux | Music is the brandy of the damned.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- George Bernard Shaw
song, and not even similar except insofar as they are part
of the same genre of music and were recorded using similar instruments.
To the best of my knowledge, neither group ever ever sued the over this
song title, or had a cause of action to do so.
--
G. Branden Robinson| One
On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 01:45:17PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Frank Mittelbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GUYS, CUT IT OUT WITH THE CCS. I KNOW BOTH OF YOU READ DEBIAN-LEGAL,
AND YOU'LL NOTE I HAVEN'T BEEN CCING YOU RECENTLY.
--
G. Branden Robinson|Damnit, we're all
not violate the DFSG.
--
G. Branden Robinson|A celibate clergy is an especially
Debian GNU/Linux |good idea, because it tends to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |suppress any hereditary propensity
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |toward fanaticism
, but you've managed to do it with this careless and
spiteful characterization of the Debian Project.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Reality is what refuses to go away
Debian GNU/Linux | when I stop believing in it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
with the sophistry. A file renaming requirement
is not DFSG-free and never will be unless the DFSG is amended to make it
thus.
--
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux |Yeah, that's what Jesus would do.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Jesus would bomb Afghanistan
we're probably stuck with lousy laws
until there are fires in the streets.)
Does anyone know if Prof. Knuth has appointed an attorney-in-fact to
handle any legal issues with TeX, METAFONT, and Computer Modern that
might crop up?
--
G. Branden Robinson|If you make people think
not permit it.
Then the Computer Modern Fonts or TeX are not free (at least according to
Branden Robinson) that may well be the case.
Only if I am compelled to ignore what I would ordinarily think is a
pretty clear and unambiguous statement from Knuth.
It is nice to learn all those new words, first
, that will be
necessary.
--
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux | Cogitationis poenam nemo meretur.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgpQd6n3s7JAm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 07:37:22PM +0200, Frank Mittelbach wrote:
Branden Robinson writes:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 11:04:56AM -0400, Boris Veytsman wrote:
1. As a true CS professor, Knuth distinguishes between the program
(i.e. the code of the program) and the name of the program
you could have some handouts
prepared, so you can get some sleep at the celebration?
I have to admit that this message has given me unexpected new insights
into the licensing issues on TeX and LaTeX; thanks for posting it. ;-)
--
G. Branden Robinson|I must despise the world
that (in theory), a license has the same force
regardless of the identity of the copyright holder, I think it would
make sense for the exception to quote the OpenSSL license, but not its
copyright notices.
--
G. Branden Robinson|America is at that awkward stage.
Debian GNU/Linux
enough of that with respect to the LPPL and the DFSG
this month. :)
--
G. Branden Robinson| What influenced me to atheism was
Debian GNU/Linux | reading the Bible cover to cover.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Twice.
http://people.debian.org/~branden
and Debian's.
I have no fundamental objection to the language you have proposed, but
please take my nitpicks into account. :)
To be more clear, I do not think the license language you have proposed
has any DFSG 3 or DFSG 4 problems.
--
G. Branden Robinson|Damnit, we're all going
their rights to insist that people not
distribute a thing that claims to be Standard LaTeX if it is not.
But distribution is not use/loading/running.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Never underestimate the power of
Debian GNU/Linux | human stupidity.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
regard as free. I think a future revision of the DFSG
should instead have an adjunct document that contains actual license
texts that meet the DFSG. Given the non-free license on the text of the
GNU GPL itself, maybe we shouldn't list it. :)
--
G. Branden Robinson| If you have
[sorry for the broad CC]
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 08:05:10PM -0700, PASCHAL,DAVID (HP-Roseville,ex1)
wrote:
Is this solution OK for everybody?
I see nothing objectionable from a DFSG perspective in the language you
have proposed.
Thanks for working on this issue!
--
G. Branden Robinson
that Debian could use in the event we ever
needed to change LaTeX. From our perspective, LaTeX would be
dual-licensed. That both licenses would be embodied in the same
document isn't really important.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Communism is just one step on the
Debian GNU/Linux
would be glad if you, on the other hand, also discuss a bit more the
Concluding debate proposal by Jeff and come to a more firm conclusion.
This reply and the previous one are my means of doing so.
--
G. Branden Robinson| You don't just decide to break
Debian GNU/Linux
encourages all authors
not to restrict any files, source or binary, from being
modified.)
--
G. Branden Robinson|There is no housing shortage in
Debian GNU/Linux |Lincoln today -- just a rumor that
[EMAIL PROTECTED
of the Debian Free Software Guidelines.
-
Now, I want to hear objections to that statement.
Hate to do this to you Jeff, but I cannot agree with you in clear
conscience.
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
G. Branden Robinson| What influenced me to atheism was
Debian GNU
violates DFSG 5. It discriminates against
people who are not under the jurisdiction of the United States
government.
--
G. Branden Robinson|I have a truly elegant proof of the
Debian GNU/Linux |above, but it is too long to fit
[EMAIL PROTECTED
901 - 1000 of 1376 matches
Mail list logo
