#include hallo.h
* MJ Ray [Fri, Sep 15 2006, 10:53:03PM]:
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to ask you to give us some days to find a peacefull
solution without starting another flamewar. But, hey, you already did it
by Cc'ing debian-legal and so attracting the trolls ASAP
solely because of the libscg You may not
lines, which
are *also* present in cdrkit. Um there's some small problem there.)
We need to make a choice right now:
a. delete those lines (Joerg#1 said the code was GPL anyway)
b. go back to a much older version
Unfortunately Eduard Bloch (one
#include hallo.h
* Radu-Cristian FOTESCU [Tue, Jul 18 2006, 03:38:32AM]:
Too bad that the moist important GNU/Linux project and the most important
GNU/Linux community can't afford a good lawyer to explain you how to protect
your mark.
Like Henning Makholm said, it's better not having me as
#include hallo.h
* Andrew Donnellan [Mon, Jun 05 2006, 07:13:29AM]:
No. The conclusion is that sane Debian developers do recognize the
problem and prepare an effective solution for it in silence. In
the meantime wanna-be developers are allowed to troll on debian-devel
list. They should just
#include hallo.h
* Olaf van der Spek [Sun, Jun 04 2006, 02:31:00PM]:
For those still playing, Olaf also isn't a Debian developer, doesn't
maintain any packages, and isn't a new-maintainer applicant. He's made
something like 5 posts to debian-legal, though, which I guess given Andrew
#include hallo.h
* Francesco Poli [Tue, Mar 21 2006, 12:18:37AM]:
D-L v. JS, now that's a flame war I'd like to see ;-)
Flaming aside, this is a non-issue. The source for cdrecord
contains invariant sections (those obnoxious warnings about using
device names), so it's certainly
#include hallo.h
* Måns Rullgård [Sun, Mar 19 2006, 01:50:24AM]:
Sam Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These are the bits I'm referring to, from cdrecorc.c (sorry for the
long lines, but that's how it's written):
---BEGIN QUOTE---
/*
* Begin restricted code for quality
#include hallo.h
* Anthony DeRobertis [Sun, Mar 19 2006, 11:42:58AM]:
Måns Rullgård wrote:
Incidentally, this is what the dvdrtools folks have already done.
Ummm, come to think of it, why is dvdrtools in non-free while cdrecord
is in main?
I am waiting for the answer of its maintainer.
#include hallo.h
* Alexander Terekhov [Sat, Mar 18 2006, 10:44:54PM]:
On 3/18/06, Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Now the question: how GPL-compatible should we consider this CDDL-like
license?
And what's the scale and gradations for GPL-compatibility in your
brainwashed
#include hallo.h
* Kel Modderman [Sat, Feb 25 2006, 10:15:11AM]:
Ehm... Sorry, would you please read the license you are talking about?
You did not even copy it to the report.
slmodem-2.9.9e-pre1a/COPYING
/*
*
*Copyright (c) 2001, Smart Link Ltd.
*All rights reserved.
#include hallo.h
* Alexander Terekhov [Sat, Feb 25 2006, 10:06:11PM]:
On 2/25/06, Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
exist. Md raised his voice and he has a point, though a DMCA-threat in
GPL context looks slightly absurd.
Slightly?!
-
The authentication sequence
#include hallo.h
* Kel Modderman [Fri, Feb 24 2006, 11:05:37PM]:
Package: sl-modem-source
Version: 2.9.9d+e-pre2-2
|Severity: grave
+sl-modem (2.9.9d+e-pre2-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * New upstream pre-release (closes: #327588)
+ * added sv.po from Daniel Nylander (closes: #330436)
#include hallo.h
* Kel Modderman [Sat, Feb 25 2006, 12:46:42AM]:
Eduard Bloch wrote:
I though I have written that above.
Can you please clarify at all? What makes a license clone an
interchangeable license, especially since you are the one responsible
for the actual license change
Hello,
I have problems interpreting the following copyright statement which
covers the documenting of the ICU library from IBM (which itself is
free). IMHO it is non-free, however it is full of juristical english and
may be acceptable for main if one can extract the relevant parts from
all the
#include hallo.h
* Branden Robinson [Sun, Aug 24 2003, 03:43:00AM]:
possible non-
developers developers developers
-
option 1 (no)
#include hallo.h
Walter Landry wrote on Wed Feb 06, 2002 um 12:17:59PM:
This rather long paragraph means that I can't take out some code
covered by patents and use it to extend my favorite text editor.
That would count as an additional restriction, and thus
GPL-incompatible.
Okay, so
Hello,
recently I was contacted by an Intel employee, asking to provide support
for their new e1000 Gigabit Adapters in Debian Linux. Implementation is
not a problem since I do already maintain some kernel-modules packages
and kernel-patch-ethernet-drivers package. But the license is a bit
vague
#include hallo.h
Walter Landry wrote on Mon Sep 24, 2001 um 10:44:03AM:
But how does this comply with the GPL? As far as I can see, the kernel
guys have been doing this for a while (see below) and the kernel is
still GPLed.
This was a point of some contention a few months ago. Look at
#include hallo.h
Eduard Bloch wrote on Fri Sep 21, 2001 um 05:24:10PM:
But how does this comply with the GPL? As far as I can see, the kernel
guys have been doing this for a while (see below) and the kernel is
still GPLed.
Okay, so if nobody has hints for me, I will upload to main soon
I am going to package the DVB driver for Siemens-based cards.
Unfortunately, this cards does not have a ROM onboard so the firmware
must be loaded using the driver.
The company which created the firmware has released their Linux drivers
under the GPL and included the binary firmware files in the
Hi,
could anyone comment the attached license? Is it suitable for non-free,
or even contrib?
-- UNACE-SOURCE v1.2b (extract-util) --
the source may be distributed and used,
but I,Marcel Lemke, retain ownership of
the copyrights to the source.
---
WWW:
#include hallo.h
David Starner wrote on Sun Apr 29, 2001 um 11:03:48PM:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 02:59:02PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
epsUtils
The GPL apply wit the following ammendment.
In what way does the GPL apply? The author apparently wants to avoid
It applies to his
1991
[...]
Gr{us,eeting}s,
Eduard.
--
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED]; HP: http://eduard.bloch.com/edecosi
0xEDF008C5(GnuPG): E6EB 98E2 B885 8FF0 6C04 5C1D E106 481E EDF0 08C5
**
No, really: Outlook Express is an excellent
GPL in
any way, the additions don't affect the usage under the GPL at all.
Anyways, yesterday, I uploaded an updated version to incoming under the
same license. Trying again...
Gr{us,eeting}s,
Eduard.
--
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL
for Debian main.
MfG,
Eduard.
--
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED]; HP: http://eduard.bloch.com/edecosi
0xEDF008C5(GnuPG): E6EB 98E2 B885 8FF0 6C04 5C1D E106 481E EDF0 08C5
**
#exclude windows.h
25 matches
Mail list logo
