Re: Request for GR: clarifying the license text licensing / freeness issue

and giving us meaningful looks as he's making his final round before locking up for the weekend... :) Thanks, -- Fabian Fagerholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Request for GR: clarifying the license text licensing / freeness issue

spares us from approaching the slippery slope of mistakes that others in this thread have brought up. So let's not pursue this GR. Cheers, -- Fabian Fagerholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Request for GR: clarifying the license text licensing / freeness issue

of the community tradition, the purpose of which is to gain further insight into the documents in question. -- Fabian Fagerholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Request for GR: clarifying the license text licensing / freeness issue

comment on them. -- Fabian Fagerholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Request for GR: clarifying the license text licensing / freeness issue

of the Social Contract and DFSG. It is not the same as an actual violation. Thus, there's no need to change the documents in question. -- Fabian Fagerholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free

Free Documentation License is not suitable for Debian main GR? -- Fabian Fagerholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] In necessariis unitas, in dubiis libertas, in omnibus caritas. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: VoIP - patented codecs - question

On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 16:30, Csillag Kristóf wrote: Maybe some of us could use G.723.1 for free (without breaking the law), after all. Perhaps it would be possible to convince MicroTelco to support a free codec? -- Fabian Fagerholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] paniq.net