. We
don't want to exclude commercial entities.
Bob
Francis Tyers wrote:
First of all, thanks to CMU for releasing the data. I've no doubt it
will be valuable to people working in the field.
I don't particularly like terms like lawyerbomb and obnoxious
advertising clause
Hello all,
I'm looking for some advice on the CMU LTI Licence, in full here[1]
I think this is a DFSG-free licence.
===
=Free Redistribution=
## Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to use and distribute
##
## this data
work. So this is intended to be like the old BSD advertising clause,
which is generally considered to be clear from a legal point of view.
Please use the data however you want; just don't say you originally
collected it.
Bob
Francis Tyers wrote:
[ Sorry in advance for cross posting ]
I'm
Thanks, it would really help :)
Best,
Fran
El dv 22 de 01 de 2010 a les 17:59 -0500, en/na Robert Frederking va
escriure:
I'll look into whether I can get the 5th clause dropped, but can't
promise yet.
Bob
Francis Tyers wrote:
I'm copying both Robert and the debian-legal list
Hello there,
I'd like some advice on a particular instance of Crown Copyright
which includes a waiver for free distribution. I'm going to try
and make out my case below, but I'd be very happy to hear other
opinions -- particularly if the waiver is compatible with the DFSG.
The original text may
by the DFSG).
A related issue would be that I would be interested if it is GPL
compatible, I have emailed the owners to this effect but have received
no reply as of a week. Would anyone on the list be able to tell me?
Many thanks for your time,
Francis Tyers
PS. I have enclosed the licence file below
On Sun, 2008-03-02 at 22:07 -0500, Joe Smith wrote:
Francis Tyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello there,
I'd like to package piece of software for Debian called VISL CG
(Constraint Grammar).
The licence file (see Appendix A.) is a bit strange
7 matches
Mail list logo
