Re: Bug#686580: netdiag: Strobe license is incorrectly stated as GPL

Matthaeus Wander mwan...@swznet.de writes: Package: netdiag Version: 1.0-13 Severity: minor AIUI, the Strobe license (as quoted below) fails to meet DFSG 1. Therefore, my guess is that the severity of this bug has to be raised to ‘grave’. (Which I'll do unless

Re: Freeness of this license

Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com writes: Hi, I am going to package fastcap and fasthenry. i have neithertheless a problem with the last paragraph of the license What do you think ? […] Unless I be mistaken, this is a BSD-style license. The last

GCTP license

Does anyone know what license GCTP [1, 2] is available under? It seems that I'm not the first to wonder on this (e. g., [3].) Is it in public domain? I need GCTP in order to prepare Debian packages for HDF-EOS, HDF-EOS 5 and SDP Toolkit [4], which are

GDAL HDF4 (HDF-EOS) driver license

It may be my english skills that are failing me, but is that ``without fee'' piece DFSG-compliant, or not? $ cat gdal/frmts/hdf4/hdf-eos/README The following source files are taken from the HDF-EOS package EHapi.c, GDapi.c, SWapi.c, HDFEOSVersion.h, HdfEosDef.h, ease.h and have

Re: GDAL HDF4 (HDF-EOS) driver license

John Halton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It may be my english skills that are failing me, but is that ``without fee'' piece DFSG-compliant, or not? Permission to use, modify, and distribute this software and its documentation for any purpose without fee is hereby granted, provided that